1997
DOI: 10.1109/34.589215
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local grayvalue invariants for image retrieval

Abstract: Abstract-This paper addresses the problem of retrieving images from large image databases. The method is based on local grayvalue invariants which are computed at automatically detected interest points. A voting algorithm and semilocal constraints make retrieval possible. Indexing allows for efficient retrieval from a database of more than 1,000 images. Experimental results show correct retrieval in the case of partial visibility, similarity transformations, extraneous features, and small perspective deformati… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
775
0
11

Year Published

2005
2005
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1,228 publications
(788 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
2
775
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…The detection and representation of image features are essential to many applications, such as image retrieval and recognition of object, texture, and scene categories, as they are more resistant to partial occlusion, background clutter, and viewpoint changes [14, 28]. This has motivated the development of several scale- and rotation-invariant local image detectors and descriptors.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The detection and representation of image features are essential to many applications, such as image retrieval and recognition of object, texture, and scene categories, as they are more resistant to partial occlusion, background clutter, and viewpoint changes [14, 28]. This has motivated the development of several scale- and rotation-invariant local image detectors and descriptors.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In contrast, object recognition based on dense local "invariant" image features have shown a lot of success recently [8,11,14,19,1,3,6,16,7] for objects with large withinclass variability in shape and appearance. In such approaches objects are modeled as a collection of parts or local features and the recognition is based on inferring object class based on similarity in parts' appearance and their spatial arrangement.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Concretely, we propose to capture the appearance of salient surface patches using local image descriptors that are invariant under affine transformations of the spatial domain [18,24] and of the brightness signal [20], and to capture their spatial relationships using multi-view geometric constraints related to those studied in the structure from motion literature [39]. This representation is directly related to a number of recent schemes for combining the local surface appearance at "interest points" [12] with geometric constraints in tasks such as wide-baseline stereo matching [44], image retrieval [36], and object recognition [20]. These methods normally either require storing a large number of views for each object, or limiting the range of admissible viewpoints.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%