2019 IEEE 5th International Conference on Computer and Communications (ICCC) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/iccc47050.2019.9064263
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Image Feature Extraction using Stacked-Autoencoder in the Bag-of-Visual Word modelling of Images

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The results shown in [8] confirms the applicability of image feature extraction via Stacked-Autoencoder to the BOVW modelling process. Although unlike SIFT, Stacked-Autoencoder (and other Deep Feature Learning algorithms) do not provide scale and rotation Invariance representations [60], the results in [8] confirms that this deficiency is largely compensated for by the histogram representation approach of BOVW and the spatial pyramid included in the image modelling for the elimination of spatial incoherency.…”
Section: The Application Of Deep Feature Learning To Image Pattern Resupporting
confidence: 65%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The results shown in [8] confirms the applicability of image feature extraction via Stacked-Autoencoder to the BOVW modelling process. Although unlike SIFT, Stacked-Autoencoder (and other Deep Feature Learning algorithms) do not provide scale and rotation Invariance representations [60], the results in [8] confirms that this deficiency is largely compensated for by the histogram representation approach of BOVW and the spatial pyramid included in the image modelling for the elimination of spatial incoherency.…”
Section: The Application Of Deep Feature Learning To Image Pattern Resupporting
confidence: 65%
“…In [8], Olaode and Naghdy demonstrated that stacked‐autoencoder image feature extraction's approach of reducing the number of features by taking advantage of the spatial redundancy during the spatial tiling resulted in considerable reduction in the categorisation time when compared with SIFT. Although the time taken is higher than the time taken to complete the unsupervised categorisation with SURF features due to the time taken to train the stacked autoencoder, the higher accuracy recorded by stacked autoencoder confirms its better efficiency.…”
Section: Proposed Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The following table represents the confusion matrix for a binary classifier and the next table represents the outcome confusion matrix of the proposed work. Accuracy decides the overall performance of the system by classifying the PD affected individuals from the healthy ones and the accuracy was determined in percentage, higher the percentage, higher the accuracy [28][29][30]. The classification accuracy for the datasets of this study was calculated using the below equation.…”
Section: A Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%