2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.017
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local irradiation alters bone morphology and increases bone fragility in a mouse model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
80
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 70 publications
(95 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
6
80
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…According to Nyaruba et al (21) and Wernle et al (22), alterations in bone strength seem to be more related to changes in the trabecular morphology than in the cortical morphology of irradiated bone. Nevertheless, the influence of ionizing radiation on the mechanical properties of bone was not yet fully clarified, as there are conflicting reports in previous studies (11,(21)(22)(23). In addition, the micro-CT images (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…According to Nyaruba et al (21) and Wernle et al (22), alterations in bone strength seem to be more related to changes in the trabecular morphology than in the cortical morphology of irradiated bone. Nevertheless, the influence of ionizing radiation on the mechanical properties of bone was not yet fully clarified, as there are conflicting reports in previous studies (11,(21)(22)(23). In addition, the micro-CT images (Fig.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…However, radiation regimens in these studies differed (eg, no high-dose radiation) from ours and those studies focused on radiation to visceral tumors in the pelvis rather than primary bone tumors. Radiation is a recognized risk factor for the development of insufficiency fractures; it decreases bone strength and the number and resiliency of trabeculae [5,19,21]. It seems plausible that higher doses of radiation would increase the risk of a fracture developing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mFEAs derived from the 12-mm isotropic voxel scan under predicted strength by 2 N, but the strength predictions were highly correlated with those from the high mesh density model (threshold ¼ 421.8 mg HA cm À 3 ). Figure 7 Of the published relationships to convert mCT-derived volumetric density to elastic modulus, this study used those derived by Wagner et al 32 , Easley et al 28 and Renders et al 35 The typical TMD range for this study is highlighted with the darker colors. A linear regression equation derived from the Wagner relationship (dashed white line) was used to calculate element-specific E t in the inhomogeneous mFEAs.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the few studies comparing FEA predictions to experimental measurements of strength in rodent tissues, long bones were tested with limited examination of material definitions. [31][32][33] In effect, mFEAs of rodent bones rely on assumptions of material properties and failure criteria from the many correlation studies involving cadaveric bone from larger species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%