Scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) has been shown to be a powerful experimental probe to detect electronic excitations and further allows to deduce fingerprints of bosonic collective modes in superconductors. Here, we demonstrate that the inclusion of inelastic tunnel events is crucial for the interpretation of tunneling spectra of unconventional superconductors and allows to directly probe electronic and bosonic excitations via STM. We apply the formalism to the iron based superconductor LiFeAs. With the inclusion of inelastic contributions, we find strong evidence for a non-conventional pairing mechanism, likely via magnetic excitations.PACS numbers: 74.55.+v, 74.20.Mn, 74.20.Rp, 74.70.Xa Electron tunneling spectroscopy has turned out to be an outstanding tool for the investigation of superconductors. A classical example is the determination of the electron-phonon pairing interaction in conventional superconductors [1,2]. More recently, quasi-particles interference spectroscopy managed to exploit the local resolution of scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) to obtain momentum space information [3][4][5]. Both examples are based on elastic tunneling theory [6,7] where one interprets the low-temperature conductance to be proportional to the electronic density of states (DOS), including renormalizations of the DOS that occur for example within the strong coupling Eliashberg formalism [8]. An energy dependent coupling to phonons or electronic collective modes and the details of these bosonic spectral features lead to a renormalization of the electronic DOS in form of peak-dip features above the superconducting coherence peaks [1]. Such pronounced peak-dip features have also been observed in cuprate and iron-based superconductors [9][10][11][12][13][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25]. A frequent interpretation is, based on elastic tunneling theory, in terms of a coupling of electrons to a sharp spin resonance mode with frequency ω res and with momentum at the antiferromagnetic ordering vector of the material [26][27][28].In an interacting system the injection of a real electron may cause both, the creation of a fermionic quasiparticle and the excitation of (bosonic) collective modes as depicted in Fig. 1. The strength of the interaction is usually crucial for the relative weight of the low-energy quasiparticle and the cloud of excitations associated with it. The excitation of the quasiparticle corresponds to the above discussed elastic tunneling, while the creation of real collective modes during the tunneling process corresponds to inelastic tunneling.In this paper we demonstrate that such inelastic tunneling events can lead to important and observable modifications of the STM spectrum in unconventional su- perconductors. In addition to fermionic exitations that are visible via elastic tunneling, inelastic tunneling spectroscopy can be used to identify the bosonic excitations of the system. We show that the fine-structures seen in LiFeAs are predominantly due to such inelastic tunneling processes and th...