Local Media Image Propagation Algorithm and Its Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

Abstract

With a large number of images provided by TV and other media flowing into the Internet and the reduction of technical barriers, images have not only become a daily practice for people to record their lives and communicate their behaviors but also become an important means for the public to express their discourse in the cyberspace. Therefore, it is of great significance to analyze the image propagation algorithm using artificial intelligence. This paper mainly studies the algorithm analysis and governance of local media image propagation in the era of artificial intelligence. In this paper, the media is the research object, with its daily dissemination of video works as the research text, in order to discover the ethical problems in its dissemination activities as the purpose, integrating disciplinary knowledge to analyze the ethical problems in this art form, and trying to find out the fundamental measures to solve the problem. The advantages and disadvantages of the video recommendation intelligent algorithm based on the BP neural network are analyzed. By comparing different algorithms, it can be seen that the video recommendation accuracy of the BP neural network algorithm based on swarm optimization (FEBP) is 15.8% higher than that of the traditional BP neural network algorithm. These intelligent algorithms are added into the image transmission system, in order to achieve the goal of improving the image transmission and recommendation effect.

Retracted: Local Media Image Propagation Algorithm and Its Governance in the Age of Artificial Intelligence

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [1]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process:…”

“…This article has been retracted by Hindawi following an investigation undertaken by the publisher [ 1 ]. This investigation has uncovered evidence of one or more of the following indicators of systematic manipulation of the publication process: Discrepancies in scope Discrepancies in the description of the research reported Discrepancies between the availability of data and the research described Inappropriate citations Incoherent, meaningless and/or irrelevant content included in the article Peer-review manipulation …”