2019
DOI: 10.1007/s11071-019-05363-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local modal participation analysis of nonlinear systems using Poincaré linearization

Abstract: The paper studies an extension to nonlinear systems of a recently proposed approach to the definition of modal participation factors. A definition is given for local mode-in-state participation factors for smooth nonlinear autonomous systems. While the definition is general, the resulting measures depend on the assumed uncertainty law governing the system initial condition, as in the linear case. The work follows Hashlamoun et al. (IEEE Trans Autom Control 54(7):1439-1449 2009) in taking a mathematical expecta… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Within the same context, some studies have utilized the same definition to determine the eigenvector matrix [33,34], whereas, in other instances, researchers defined a more convenient mathematical form and made an indistinct use of the term [35][36][37][38][39][40]. However, it is to be noted that the definition of modal participation has an associated dichotomy [17] with it, especially in time-invariant linear systems, where it is observed that there is interchangeability between the measurement of participation of the state in modes [41] and that of participation of modes in states. This is solved using an averaging technique of the initial conditions [17] with a symmetric uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the same context, some studies have utilized the same definition to determine the eigenvector matrix [33,34], whereas, in other instances, researchers defined a more convenient mathematical form and made an indistinct use of the term [35][36][37][38][39][40]. However, it is to be noted that the definition of modal participation has an associated dichotomy [17] with it, especially in time-invariant linear systems, where it is observed that there is interchangeability between the measurement of participation of the state in modes [41] and that of participation of modes in states. This is solved using an averaging technique of the initial conditions [17] with a symmetric uncertainty.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, cheaper numerical approximations using "adequate-fidelity" models are usually acceptable [2]. In this regard, reduced order modeling offers a viable technique to address systems characterized by underlying patterns [3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12]. This is especially true for fluid flows dominated by coherent structures (e.g., atmospheric and oceanic flows) [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, ROMs are limited in how they handle nonlinear dependence and perform poorly for complex physical phenomena, which are inherently multiscale in space and time [16,17,18,19]. Researchers continue to search for efficient and reliable ROM techniques for such transient nonlinear systems [20,21,22,23,24,6]. The identification of a reduced basis to ensure a compressed representation that is minimally lossy is a core component of most ROM development strategies (some examples include [25,26,27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%