2004
DOI: 10.1002/nme.1059
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local modal reduction in explicit dynamics with domain decomposition. Part 2: specific interface treatment when modal subdomains are involved

Abstract: SUMMARYDuring the last 2 years, a multidomain formalism for structural dynamics based on a multi-time-step algorithm and local linear modal reduction was proposed by Gravouil, Combescure, Herry & Faucher.In the first part of this paper, we extended modal reduction to subdomains undergoing finite rigid-body rotations. Here, we focus on the consequences of local modal projection (either linear or geometrically non-linear) on the treatment of interface problems between subdomains. In particular, we address the is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…where we can set From Equation (40), the relation of SDOFs and PDOFs is arranged as shown in Equation (41).…”
Section: Formulation Of the Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where we can set From Equation (40), the relation of SDOFs and PDOFs is arranged as shown in Equation (41).…”
Section: Formulation Of the Versionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Anyhow, as pointed out in [46], associating the singular values to the actual elastic and kinetic energies of the system is "incorrect in principle and may yield misleading results." So, to ensure the stability and invertibility of the interface operator (16), see also [47], in the snapshot matrix nodal displacements are gathered, and a weak continuity across subdomains is enforced through the local stiffness k, see Eq. (15).…”
Section: Reduced-order Modelling Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Many engineering applications of this method are available for transient nonlinear dynamics, FSI, non‐matching interfaces, co‐computations, simulation of automobile crashes, hybrid experimental/numerical real‐time testing, earthquake loading, impact on concrete structures, microsystems, coupled electro‐mechanical problems, and fracture in polysilicon micro electro‐mechanical systems, with two or more subdomains with their own integrator and timescale , , (see for instance for an example with nine subdomains, nine different time integrators, and a maximum ratio of time steps close to 1000).…”
Section: Heterogeneous Asynchronous Time Integratorsmentioning
confidence: 99%