2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2015.09.093
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local modularity for community detection in complex networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
27
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2
1

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
27
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Benefited from the underlying implications, many community-detection methods have been proposed and developed during the past decade [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Typical examples include the spectral analysis [22], random walk [23][24][25], label propagation [30], dynamic evolutionary [26][27][28][29], and modularity optimization [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Benefited from the underlying implications, many community-detection methods have been proposed and developed during the past decade [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30]. Typical examples include the spectral analysis [22], random walk [23][24][25], label propagation [30], dynamic evolutionary [26][27][28][29], and modularity optimization [31,32].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Modularity functions that take into account this information may provide a view of different depth into the community structures in the networks. Generally, this type of modularity functions can therefore be called as local modularity [ 47 , 48 ]. Differently from the global modularity, different communities are generally assigned different backgrounds in local modularity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1. The network contains 66 nodes, 620 links, the average degree is 1.3338, the average out-closeness is 5.7023, the average in-closeness is 4.6657, global clustering coefficient is 0.793 [5][6][7][8][9].…”
Section: Construction Of Courses Relationship Network Model Of Electrmentioning
confidence: 99%