2017
DOI: 10.22146/pcd.25773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local Politics in Indonesia, 1999-2010: A Literature Review

Abstract: This paper attempts to map out the existing literature on the post-1999 political landscape at the local level. This literature review is made up by five key questions: (1) How is localising of power in Indonesia understood?; (2) How does power operate at local levels?; (3) What are the forces that shape Indonesian local politics?; (4) What are the prominent manifestations in Indonesian local politics?; (5) What are alternative political forces that possibly represent the setting up of the street demonstration… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Introduction in 2005 of direct elections for the gubernur (head of the provincial government) and bupati / walikota (head of the district/municipality) intensified pressures for local rulers to respond to citizen' demands in order to sustain their political support and legitimacy (Sulistiyanto & Erb, 2009). Pressure for reform also came from a range of international organisations, donors and development agencies that promoted decentralisation and “good governance” reform agendas in Indonesia (Hanif & Pratikno, 2012, pp. 193–195).…”
Section: Results: Localising Transparency In Sub‐national Resource Gomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Introduction in 2005 of direct elections for the gubernur (head of the provincial government) and bupati / walikota (head of the district/municipality) intensified pressures for local rulers to respond to citizen' demands in order to sustain their political support and legitimacy (Sulistiyanto & Erb, 2009). Pressure for reform also came from a range of international organisations, donors and development agencies that promoted decentralisation and “good governance” reform agendas in Indonesia (Hanif & Pratikno, 2012, pp. 193–195).…”
Section: Results: Localising Transparency In Sub‐national Resource Gomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sulit untuk tidak mengatakan bahwa praktek seperti ini berdampak buruk terhadap proses demokratisasi Indonesia. Argumentasi banyak pengamat terkait demokratisasi Indonesia yang illiberal, ekslusif dan elitis, dibajak oleh predatory interests, dekat dengan perilaku koruptif, lemah dalam akuntabilitas dan transparansi serta belum mampu memfasilitasi output kinerja good governance, sebagai akibat dari praktek politik kekerabatan yang dipertontonkan sejak diberlakukannya Pilkada memang terkonfirmasi secara empirik (Hadiz and Robison, 2005;Choi, 2007;Hadiz, 2007;Hanif and Pratikno, 2012;Mariana and Husin, 2017). Penulis berpendapat bahwa potensi buruk berpeluang untuk terjadi di masa mendatang sebagai dampak dari semakin naiknya tren dinasti politik pasca Pilkada Serentak 2020, jika tidak disertai dengan upaya memitigasi potensi-potensi buruk tersebut dengan berbagai strategi yang tepat, komprehensif dan berkesinambungan.…”
Section: Pendahuluanunclassified
“…The aim of this research is to describe and analyze good governance in the Sidoarjo Regency Regional Library and describe and analyze factors that can support and hinder the implementation of good governance in the Sidoarjo Regency Regional Library. Theory Good Governance (Hanif & Pratikno, 2012) explains literally that good governance can be interpreted as governance so that there is an assumption that governance is the equivalent or synonym of government. So that in its application in the field it only looks at the government and then there is a sigma that good governance and good government are the same.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%