2002
DOI: 10.1215/s0012-7094-02-11411-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Local rigidity of hyperbolic 3-manifolds after Dehn surgery

Abstract: It is well known that some lattices in SO(n, 1) can be nontrivially deformed when included in SO(n +1, 1) (e.g., via bending on a totally geodesic hypersurface); this contrasts with the (super) rigidity of higher rank lattices. M. Kapovich recently gave the first examples of lattices in SO(3, 1) which are locally rigid in SO(4, 1) by considering closed hyperbolic 3-manifolds obtained by Dehn filling on hyperbolic two-bridge knots. We generalize this result to Dehn filling on a more general class of one-cusped … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since M is generated by two peripheral elements, by a theorem of M. Kapovich [1994] ρ must be the holonomy representation of M in SO(3, 1). Theorem 1.5 involves an analysis of R(M, SO(4, 1)) in a neighborhood of ρ 0 , following closely the results obtained by Scannell [2002]. The tangent space to…”
Section: Msc2000: 57m50mentioning
confidence: 89%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Since M is generated by two peripheral elements, by a theorem of M. Kapovich [1994] ρ must be the holonomy representation of M in SO(3, 1). Theorem 1.5 involves an analysis of R(M, SO(4, 1)) in a neighborhood of ρ 0 , following closely the results obtained by Scannell [2002]. The tangent space to…”
Section: Msc2000: 57m50mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…By a theorem of Scannell [2002], H 1 (M, R 3,1 ) has dimension one. In Proposition 4.2, we show that the tangent cone is contained in the union…”
Section: Msc2000: 57m50mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The quotient manifolds H 3 /Γ in these examples are non-Haken. K. Scannell [195] constructed analogous examples with Haken quotients H 3 /Γ.…”
Section: Theorem 116 (D Johnson and J Millsonmentioning
confidence: 99%