2008 IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation 2008
DOI: 10.1109/etfa.2008.4638415
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization in a wide range of industrial environments using relative 3D ceiling features

Abstract: This paper presents a localization system for mobile robots that are able to navigate autonomously in industrial environments like factory and exhibition halls. Previous approaches show that ceiling structures like beams, pipes and lighting installation are wellsuited for self-localization in large halls. With this paper we describe how to use ceiling structures, measured with a 3D laser range sensor, as natural landmarks. Due to the novel relative representation of 3D ceiling features this method can be used … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although an accurate 3D model of the environment in not required, an accurate and consistent prior is always desired when the localization is integrated with other navigation functions. Similarly in [181,182], a 3D point cloud of the environment is obtained by servoing a 2D LIDAR, and extracted 2D features are used to perform localization. This method has been shown to work well in an indoor environment with well structured ceiling features.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although an accurate 3D model of the environment in not required, an accurate and consistent prior is always desired when the localization is integrated with other navigation functions. Similarly in [181,182], a 3D point cloud of the environment is obtained by servoing a 2D LIDAR, and extracted 2D features are used to perform localization. This method has been shown to work well in an indoor environment with well structured ceiling features.…”
Section: Localizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tae‐Bum et al () proposed an MCL with topological information to reduce the number of random samples used for the initial phase. In (Wulf, Lecking, and Wagner () and Lecking, Wulf, and Wagner (), the MCL system uses ceiling features measured with a three‐dimensional (3D) laser scanner to overcome the sensor occlusion problem. Fox (), Kwok, Fox, and Meila (), and Heinemann, Haase, and Zell () proposed MCL alternatives that can dynamically adjust the size of the samples when they are used to track the robot pose (but they are not fit for solving the global localization problem).…”
Section: State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Real world objects, such as obstacles (including moving obstacles) or desired arrival points are processed in this way. After recognition of the obstacles, and automatic localization (C. Eberst and Christensen, 2000), (D. Lecking and Wagner, 2008), (S. Kolski and Siegwart, 2006), the smart controller evaluates several short-term strategies and sends the best one to the robots real-time controller. It receives the advices as commands and has two alternatives: ignore or take them according to robots current priorities.…”
Section: Rta Controllermentioning
confidence: 99%