2007
DOI: 10.1128/aem.01952-06
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of Functional Polypeptides in Bacterial Inclusion Bodies

Abstract: Bacterial inclusion bodies, while showing intriguing amyloid-like features, such as a ␤-sheet-based intermolecular organization, binding to amyloid-tropic dyes, and origin in a sequence-selective deposition process, hold an important amount of native-like secondary structure and significant amounts of functional polypeptides. The aggregation mechanics supporting the occurrence of both misfolded and properly folded protein is controversial. Single polypeptide chains might contain both misfolded stretches drivin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 95 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
(64 reference statements)
2
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Flow cytometry analysis of the induced VP1GFP cultures showed the fluorescent intensity increased approximately 8-fold at 60-minutes post-induction and approximately 30-fold at 3.5-hours post-induction. Fluorescence microscopy showed the VP1GFP protein was localized in the flagella end of the cells, which was also reported and characterized by Dr. Villaverde's research group as inclusion bodies [57]. The induction levels for both GFPCAT and VP1GFP were similar under the experimental conditions, which was expected for these very similar plasmid constructs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Flow cytometry analysis of the induced VP1GFP cultures showed the fluorescent intensity increased approximately 8-fold at 60-minutes post-induction and approximately 30-fold at 3.5-hours post-induction. Fluorescence microscopy showed the VP1GFP protein was localized in the flagella end of the cells, which was also reported and characterized by Dr. Villaverde's research group as inclusion bodies [57]. The induction levels for both GFPCAT and VP1GFP were similar under the experimental conditions, which was expected for these very similar plasmid constructs.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…The mean signal acquisition from 50,000 cells was used to characterize sample intensity. VP1GFP inclusion bodies were confirmed by fluorescence microscopy (Nikon Ti, 60X TIRF oil) [57]. …”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, simple proteolytic destruction of the test protein, as might be expected for poorly folded proteins, can relieve the interference and lead to false positive results. Since a protein's solubility is not necessarily related to its activity or thermodynamic stability (Famm et al, 2008; Garcia-Fruitos et al, 2007), it is not possible to separate which of these phenomena causes the enhanced antibiotic resistance in our examples; however, the results highlight the potential of the tripartite system as a means to select variants of proteins that are expressed in soluble form and are thus easier to produce, handle, and characterize.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…[3] While in the past IBs were believed to be formed by unfolded or largely misfolded polypeptide chains and therefore biologically inert, [5] recent insights show them to be constituted by folded and biofunctional protein species, [6] whose presence is allowed by a particular amyloid-like organization. [7][8][9] Therefore, IBs formed by enzymes such as b-galactosidase, D-amino acid oxidase, maltodextrin phosphorylase, sialic acid aldolase, and polyphosphate kinase [8,[10][11][12][13] can be used as catalysts in different processes. On the other hand, the in vivo formation of IBs is regulated by several cellular genes (mainly encoding proteases and chaperones), which makes the genetic manipulation of their nanometer-scale properties feasible.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%