1984
DOI: 10.1007/bf00115338
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localization of NORs in karyotypes of four Rana species

Abstract: NORs were localized by Ag-AS-staining in karyotypes of Rana nigromaculata, R. macrocnemis, R. latastei (2n = 26) and R. chensinensis, 2n = 24. As in the majority of other Rana species, the NORs are located in the long arms of the 10th (or 11 th in R. chensinensis) chromosome pair. The presence of a second secondary constriction in R. latasteL as reported earlier, was not confirmed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
10
0
1

Year Published

1997
1997
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
10
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparison of the chromosomal data of P. ridibundus with other species of the green frogs (Heppich, 1978;Schmid, 1978;Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997) and some species of brown frogs (Orlova et al, 1978;Birstein, 1984;Green, Borkin, 1993;Popov, Dimitrov, 1999) with data from this study confi rms the close similarity of several chromosome pairs by size and morphology. On the whole, the interspecifi c differences in karyotypes of species of Rana and Pelophylax are manifested in the distinctions of late replication banding patterns (Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997), fl uorescence replication banding patterns (Picariello et al, 2002) and in the locations of C-heterochromatin blocks (Schmid, 1978;Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997;present study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Comparison of the chromosomal data of P. ridibundus with other species of the green frogs (Heppich, 1978;Schmid, 1978;Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997) and some species of brown frogs (Orlova et al, 1978;Birstein, 1984;Green, Borkin, 1993;Popov, Dimitrov, 1999) with data from this study confi rms the close similarity of several chromosome pairs by size and morphology. On the whole, the interspecifi c differences in karyotypes of species of Rana and Pelophylax are manifested in the distinctions of late replication banding patterns (Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997), fl uorescence replication banding patterns (Picariello et al, 2002) and in the locations of C-heterochromatin blocks (Schmid, 1978;Miura, 1995;Miura et al, 1997;present study).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…The comparative analysis of the karyotypes of frogs belonging to the complex of R. macrocnemis from Armenia (our data), Georgia (Ivanov, Madjanov, 1973), (Popov, Dimitrov, 1999) and form "macrocnemis" from Russia (Birstein, 1984;Ivanov, Madjanov, 1973) revealed their similarities on chromosomal pairs № 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7 and 12 (Table 4). The cardinal differences of the chromosomal sets of "camerani" and "macrocnemis" forms relate to the chromosomal pairs № 8, 9, 10, 11 and 13 (Table 4).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 69%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Most of the species of the genus Rana share «standard» or «primitive» NOR location -intercalary on the long arm of the lOth chromosome pair (SCHMID 1978b;BIRSTEIN 1984). As in European water frogs, in R. temporaria the NOR presents its standard position.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%