2021
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ac1cdf
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized Acceleration of Energetic Particles by a Weak Shock in the Solar Corona

Abstract: Globally propagating shocks in the solar corona have long been studied to quantify their involvement in the acceleration of energetic particles. However, this work has tended to focus on large events associated with strong solar flares and fast coronal mass ejections (CMEs), where the waves are sufficiently fast to easily accelerate particles to high energies. Here we present observations of particle acceleration associated with a global wave event which occurred on 2011 October 1. Using differential emission … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
15
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
3
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the measured intensity of the EUV images is a function of both the temperature and the density, the small percentage increase in temperature indicates that the measured EUV intensity variation is mainly due to the change of the plasma density rather than the temperature. Assume that the observed wave train propagated perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field (see Vršnak et al 2002;Long et al 2021); this is reasonable, since the magnetic field in the quiet-Sun corona has a strong vertical component. The magnetosonic Mach number M ms can be calculated using…”
Section: Plasma Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the measured intensity of the EUV images is a function of both the temperature and the density, the small percentage increase in temperature indicates that the measured EUV intensity variation is mainly due to the change of the plasma density rather than the temperature. Assume that the observed wave train propagated perpendicular to the direction of the magnetic field (see Vršnak et al 2002;Long et al 2021); this is reasonable, since the magnetic field in the quiet-Sun corona has a strong vertical component. The magnetosonic Mach number M ms can be calculated using…”
Section: Plasma Diagnosticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the kinematics of CBFs, we applied to the AIA observations the methodology of the Coronal Analysis of SHocks and Waves (CASHeW) framework (Kozarev et al, 2017), updated and implemented in SPREAdFAST. Our framework estimates the CBF kinematics in a similar way to Long et al (Long et al, 2021) and Downs et al (Downs et al, 2021), by following the leading edge of the front on consecutive images. In addition, we calculate the kinematics of the peak and back edge of the CBFs over time, which allows us to estimate their timedependent mean intensity and thickness.…”
Section: Cbf Kinematics and Geometric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows parameter evolution along the individual shock-crossing field lines, for the May 11, 2011 event, between the solar surface and 10 R Sun . The panels show, in different colors, the shock-field angle θ BN , shock upstream magnetic field amplitude |B|, shock speed V shock , and the shock density jump ratio, r. Similarly to other authors, (Frassati et al, 2019;Frassati et al, 2020;Long et al, 2021), we employ DEM analysis to estimate the shock strength from AIA observations. We find that, while we use a different DEM model than these authors (Cheung et al, 2015), the general results are similar-we find weak coronal shocks.…”
Section: Plasma Parameters Along Individual Shock-crossing Magnetic F...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To characterize the kinematics of CBFs, we applied to the AIA observations the methodology of the Coronal Analysis of SHocks and Waves (CASHeW) framework [20], updated and implemented in SPREAdFAST. Our framework estimates the CBF kinematics in a similar way to Long et al [21] and Downs et al [22], by following the leading edge of the front on consecutive images. In addition, we calculate the kinematics of the peak and back edge of the CBFs over time, which allows us to estimate their time-dependent mean intensity and thickness.…”
Section: Cbf Kinematics and Geometric Modelingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Figure 4 shows parameter evolution along the individual shock-crossing field lines, for the May 11, 2011 event, between the solar surface and 10 R Sun . The panels show, in different colors, the shock-field angle θ BN , shock upstream magnetic field amplitude |B|, shock speed V shock , and the shock density jump ratio, r. Similarly to other authors, [34,35,21], we employ DEM analysis to estimate the shock strength from AIA observations. We find that, while we use a different DEM model than these authors [33], the general results are similar -we find weak coronal shocks.…”
Section: Plasma Parameters Along Individual Shock-crossing Magnetic F...mentioning
confidence: 99%