2015
DOI: 10.1109/tnet.2014.2344663
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Localized and Precise Boundary Detection in 3-D Wireless Sensor Networks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The approach faces the misinterpreted as a B-N due to projection, so it uses the Isolated F ragment F iltering (IF F ) approach to remove false positives. The limitation of paper [37] is its assumption that nodes have prior global information about coordinates (by creating a localized coordinate system) and embedding a 3D network on the 2D plane. In Localized boundary detection and parametrization (LBDP ) algorithm [38] a convex-hull based algorithm [39] is proposed for 3D B-N detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The approach faces the misinterpreted as a B-N due to projection, so it uses the Isolated F ragment F iltering (IF F ) approach to remove false positives. The limitation of paper [37] is its assumption that nodes have prior global information about coordinates (by creating a localized coordinate system) and embedding a 3D network on the 2D plane. In Localized boundary detection and parametrization (LBDP ) algorithm [38] a convex-hull based algorithm [39] is proposed for 3D B-N detection.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Zhou et al also proposed a two-step localized algorithm for precise boundary detection [23]. In the first step, an Unit Ball Fitting (UBF) process is used to coarsely identify the boundary nodes.…”
Section: Boundary Detection In Volume Networkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sensors surrounding an inner node are the 1-hop neighbors of it that are located on the surface or in the body of a ball that using the inner sensor as its center and the sensor's communication range as its ball radius. Different from an unit ball been used in UBF in [23], the ball does not need to be fully filled with nodes, and the 1-hop neighbors of an inner sensor v roughly shape a latitude-circle-liked closed path r v in the ball. The routes on the path are ensured by the connections between nodes.…”
Section: Identifying Boundary Nodes In Surface Coveragementioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, they are similar somehow when events occur in the whole network region. A boundary detection mechanism in three-dimensional wireless networks has been proposed in [ 18 ], where sensor nodes on the boundaries are identified based on local information within a one-hop neighborhood. An algorithm that locally constructs planarized triangular meshes is developed and extended from two-to three-dimensions for producing the boundary surface.…”
Section: Related Work and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Event coverage detection and location determination have been explored relatively extensively for two- and three-dimensional terrestrial WSNs [ 18 , 19 , 20 ]. Generally, sensor nodes are either static or moving along pre-determined itineraries and can be localized through global positioning systems or other localization techniques [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%