2014
DOI: 10.1109/tit.2014.2325570
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locally Repairable Codes

Abstract: Distributed storage systems for large-scale applications typically use replication for reliability. Recently, erasure codes were used to reduce the large storage overhead, while increasing data reliability. A main limitation of off-the-shelf erasure codes is their high-repair cost during single node failure events. A major open problem in this area has been the design of codes that i) are repair efficient and ii) achieve arbitrarily high data rates.In this paper, we explore the repair metric of locality, which… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
531
1
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 394 publications
(540 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
7
531
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, (1; s) PMDS, called Maximally Recoverable codes in [6], satisfy also the requirements of Locally Repairable codes [10], [13]. Additionally, the recently-defined STAIR codes relax the failure-coverage of SD codes in order to allow for general constructions [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In fact, (1; s) PMDS, called Maximally Recoverable codes in [6], satisfy also the requirements of Locally Repairable codes [10], [13]. Additionally, the recently-defined STAIR codes relax the failure-coverage of SD codes in order to allow for general constructions [8].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Locally repairable codes (LRCs) [1,2] have recently attracted considerable attention as a promising technology for data protection. An ðr; tÞ-LRC is a code having the following property: each coordinate of codewords can be recovered from at most r other coordinates (called a repair set), and there are at least t disjoint repair sets for each coordinate, where r and t are called locality and availability, respectively [3].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(Han and Lastras-Montano [18] provide a similar upper bound which is coincident with the one in [11] for small minimum distances, and also present codes that attain this bound in the context of reliable memories.) In [10], Papailiopoulos and Dimakis generalize the bound in [9] to vector codes, and present locally repairable coding schemes which exhibits MDS property at the cost of small amount of additional storage per node.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subsequently, in Section III, we derive an upper bound on the minimum distance d min of the vector codes that satisfy a given locality constraint, which establishes a trade off between node failure resilience (i.e., d min ) and per node storage α. 1 The bound presented in [10] can be considered as a special case of our bound with δ = 2. Further, we present an explicit construction for LRCs which attain this bound on minimum distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%