Locating a mate in 3D: the case of Temora longicornis

Abstract

Using laser optics to illuminate high-resolution video-recordings, we revealed behavioural mechanisms through which males of the calanoid copepod speciesTemora longicornis locate females. Males of T. longicornis swam at signi¢cantly faster speeds than females along more sinuous routes, possibly re£ecting adaptations to increase encounter with females. Upon approaching within 2 mm (i.e. two body lengths) of a female's swimming path, males accelerated to signi¢cantly higher pursuit speeds. Pursuit trajectories closely traced the trajectories of females, suggesting that males were following detectable trails created by swimming females. Males of T. longicornis detected female trails up to at least 10-s old, and tracked trails for distances exceeding 13 cm, or 130 body lengths. Females were positioned up to 34.2 mm away from males (i.e. reactive distance) when males initiated`mate-tracking'. It was always the males of T. longicornis that detected and pursued mates. In rare events, males pursued other males. Behavioural £exibility was exhibited by males during mate-tracking. Males generally tracked the trails of`cruising' (i.e. fast-swimming) females with high accuracy, while the pursuits of`hovering' (i.e. slow-swimming) females often included`casting' behaviour, in which males performed sharp turns in zigzag patterns within localized volumes. This casting by males suggested that hovering females create more dispersed trails than cruising females. Casting behaviour also was initiated by males near locations where females had hopped, suggesting that rapid movements by females disrupt the continuity of their trails. Males were ine¤cient at choosing initial tracking directions, following trails in the incorrect direction in 27 of the 67 (40%) mating pursuits observed. Males usually attempted to correct misguided pursuits by`back-tracking' along trails in the correct direction. Males were observed to detect and track their own previous trajectories without females present, suggesting the possibility that males follow their own trails during back-tracking. Observations of males tracking their own trails and the trails of other males bring into question the speci¢city of trails as a mechanism promoting reproductive isolation among co-occurring planktonic copepods.

Zooplankton recovery after fish removal: Limitations of the egg bank

“…1). Although detection of pheromone trails by males has been demonstrated in marine calanoid copepods (Katona 1973;Doall et al 1998), we know of no studies showing chemical detection of mates from a distance in freshwater copepods (Williamson and Reid 2001). Thus, we rely on Gerritsen's estimate of encounter radius in the absence of any information about chemical detection.…”

The effect of mating behavior and temperature variation on the critical population density of a freshwater copepod

“…Experiments were conducted in a 3.0-liter cubic vessel containing spring water that was maintained at the treatment temperature by circulating distilled water in a large water jacket through a refrigeration unit. Mating behavior was recorded using 3D Schlieren laser videography, as developed by Strickler and Hwang (1998) and further described by Doall et al (1998).…”

Optimal mate choice patterns in pelagic copepods

“…The process of locating a mate is well studied in several species of copepods. Species like T. longicornis or O. davisae rely on pheromone cues released by the females to find mating partners (Kiørboe 2007;Doall et al 1998;Yen et al 1998). Others like A. tonsa use hydrodynamical cues for mate search (Bagøien and Kiørboe 2004).…”