2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.3258491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating La atoms in epitaxial Bi3.25La0.75Ti3O12 films through atomic resolution electron energy loss spectroscopy mapping

Abstract: Effects of W doping and annealing parameters on the ferroelectricity and fatigue properties of sputtered Bi 3.25 La 0.75 Ti 3 O 12 films J. Vac. Sci. Technol. A 21, 787 (2003); 10.1116/1.1570840 Ferroelectric properties of Bi 3.25 La 0.75 Ti 3 O 12 thin films prepared by chemical solution deposition

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1). Although the La substitution for Bi and the recently identified preferential location (Gunawan et al, 2009) via EELS mapping are not considered in the simulation, there is an excellent overall agreement between the experiment (raw image, unprocessed) and calculations with the expected structure retrieved from the literature (Kim et al, 2007) where one can identify Bi 2 -O 2 bilayers separated by perovskite slabs. Based on the simulations, the fine contrast seen as a tail around the heavier Bi atoms is due to the Ti in the tilted octahedra of the perovskite slabs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1). Although the La substitution for Bi and the recently identified preferential location (Gunawan et al, 2009) via EELS mapping are not considered in the simulation, there is an excellent overall agreement between the experiment (raw image, unprocessed) and calculations with the expected structure retrieved from the literature (Kim et al, 2007) where one can identify Bi 2 -O 2 bilayers separated by perovskite slabs. Based on the simulations, the fine contrast seen as a tail around the heavier Bi atoms is due to the Ti in the tilted octahedra of the perovskite slabs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…The improvements are due, first, to the increased electron beam current for probe sizes in the order of 1–2 Å and, second, to the benefits in improved stability of the entire instrument. Although the EELS mapping performance of various aberration-corrected microscopes varies due to the collection efficiency of the spectrometers and operation [e.g., acquisition times range from several seconds/pixel (Bosman et al, 2007; Kimoto et al, 2007) to down to 30 ms/pixel (Muller, 2009; Botton et al, 2010)], it is clear that atomic resolution information can now be retrieved on a range of samples and provide essential information to understand growth mechanisms, the chemistry at interfaces, as well as defects and materials properties (Colliex et al, 2009; Gunawan et al, 2009; Muller, 2009; Varela et al, 2009; Botton et al, 2010). Also, novel imaging methods made possible by the smaller probe in aberration-corrected microscopes make it possible to attempt the detection of lighter atoms in complex structures (Findlay et al, 2009).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of the incoherent nature of the signal, high-angle annular dark-field (HAADF) STEM imaging provides directly interpretable and chemically sensitive images. Besides, as STEM can be combined with EELS to map the elemental distribution at atomic resolution, STEM-EELS has become a powerful tool to study the structure of materials, and to characterize defects and interfaces on the atomic scale.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] Performed in a scanning transmission electron microscope (STEM), the technique uses an atomic-sized electron probe to excite core-level electrons in the sample, while detectors monitor the spectra of energy-loss electrons and/or the flux of characteristic x-rays. A wealth of atomic-scale information is provided, 3,4,[9][10][11] including the locations and species of atoms, i.e., elemental maps, and, in the case of electron energy-loss spectroscopy (EELS), information on electronic bonding. While the benefits of using EELS over characteristic x-rays include superior detection efficiency, access to bonding information, and the ability to map light elements, atomic-resolution elemental maps acquired using EELS are, in fact, prone to artifacts associated with elastic scattering of the electron probe within the sample.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%