2004
DOI: 10.1068/d20s
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating Science, Locating Salmon: Institutions, Linkages, and Spatial Practices in Early British Columbia Fisheries Science

Abstract: Fisheries scientists established institutions, engaged metropolitan ideas and local knowledge, and worked out particular spatial practices to produce fisheries science in early-20th-century British Columbia. Problems of distance and the mobility of scientific specimens shaped practices. The difficulties of operating in a peripheral location influenced the institutional development of the field and the emphases of science towards commercially important problems focusing on salmon migration and life history. In … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, political ecology explores how environmental issues, dynamics and conditions are products and drivers of political processes that reinforce the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ rooted in societal struggles manifested at multiple scales (Robbins, 2004; Roth, 2015; Perreault et al, 2015). Animals feature as topics of study (often by scholars self-identifying as both animal geographers and political ecologists), including animal/fish husbandry (Bassett, 1988; Lien, 2005; Turner, 2004), agriculture (Emel and Neo, 2011, 2015; Evenden, 2004; Hovorka, 2006), biodiversity conservation and wildlife conflict (Barua, 2014b; Campbell, 2007; Collard, 2012; DeMotts and Hoon, 2012; Goldman et al, 2013; Goldman, 2009; Lunstrum, 2014; Neumann, 1992, Sundberg, 2011), and animal commodification (Collard, 2014; Collard and Dempsey, 2013). Yet political ecology is largely anthropocentric with animals as backgrounded, incidental, static or material things (Emel and Neo, 2015; Hobson, 2007; Srinivasan, 2016).…”
Section: Animal Hybridity: Opportunities In Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, political ecology explores how environmental issues, dynamics and conditions are products and drivers of political processes that reinforce the ‘haves’ and ‘have-nots’ rooted in societal struggles manifested at multiple scales (Robbins, 2004; Roth, 2015; Perreault et al, 2015). Animals feature as topics of study (often by scholars self-identifying as both animal geographers and political ecologists), including animal/fish husbandry (Bassett, 1988; Lien, 2005; Turner, 2004), agriculture (Emel and Neo, 2011, 2015; Evenden, 2004; Hovorka, 2006), biodiversity conservation and wildlife conflict (Barua, 2014b; Campbell, 2007; Collard, 2012; DeMotts and Hoon, 2012; Goldman et al, 2013; Goldman, 2009; Lunstrum, 2014; Neumann, 1992, Sundberg, 2011), and animal commodification (Collard, 2014; Collard and Dempsey, 2013). Yet political ecology is largely anthropocentric with animals as backgrounded, incidental, static or material things (Emel and Neo, 2015; Hobson, 2007; Srinivasan, 2016).…”
Section: Animal Hybridity: Opportunities In Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These ‘translations’ are the displacements in meaning and objective that result from the inevitable compromise among disparate interests. Within geography, various authors have illustrated the utility of actor–network and science studies' perspectives (Murdoch 1994; deLaet 2000; Barnes 2001; Winder 2001; Evenden 2004). Actor–network theory and translation also have particular reference to the practice of patenting and the detours that engineers are forced to take to authorize their inventions.…”
Section: Knowledge Transfers Codification and Translation Over Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, a special issue of JHB published in 2012 explored the relationships between place and scientific practice in North America, with regard to (for example) the geography of research stations (Vetter 2012), conservation of biological significant locales (Alagona 2012, Rumore 2012, and the geographic dimensions of scientific controversy (Bocking 2012). Other work has focused on the collection and transport of biological materials (Evenden 2004, Hung 2016, especially in relation to colonial activity (Schiebinger and Swan 2005). The core intuition of the spatial turn is that cultural contingency entails geographical contingency: science is shaped by the places in which it is practiced and received (Withers 2009), and thus our understanding of science is greatly expanded by considering a broader array of geo-social contexts.…”
Section: Geographymentioning
confidence: 99%