2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10980-016-0373-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locating wildlife crossings for multispecies connectivity across linear infrastructures

Abstract: International audienceContextLinear transportation infrastructures traverse and separate wildlife populations, potentially leading to their short- and long-term decline at local and regional scales. To attenuate such effects, we need wildlife crossings suitable for a wide range of species.ObjectivesWe propose a method for identifying the best locations for wildlife crossings along linear infrastructures so as to improve the connectivity of species with varying degrees of mobility and living in different habita… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 73 publications
(64 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
1
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…network metrics; Bastille‐Rousseau, Douglas‐Hamilton, Blake, Northrup, & Wittemyer, ; Wittemyer, Keating, Vollrath, & Douglas‐Hamilton, ) could provide more refined identification of crossing locations in prioritization schemes. Likewise, approaches assessing connectivity for multiple species may be preferable where community or multispecies conservation goals are paramount (Mimet, Clauzel, & Foltête, ). We focus on a single species in this study, given the lack of comparable data from other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…network metrics; Bastille‐Rousseau, Douglas‐Hamilton, Blake, Northrup, & Wittemyer, ; Wittemyer, Keating, Vollrath, & Douglas‐Hamilton, ) could provide more refined identification of crossing locations in prioritization schemes. Likewise, approaches assessing connectivity for multiple species may be preferable where community or multispecies conservation goals are paramount (Mimet, Clauzel, & Foltête, ). We focus on a single species in this study, given the lack of comparable data from other species.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likewise, approaches assessing connectivity for multiple species may be preferable where community or multispecies conservation goals are paramount (Mimet, Clauzel, & Foltête, 2016). We focus on a single species in this study, given the lack of comparable data from other species.…”
Section: Frairmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Graph theory has seen extensive development and growing applications in ecology and conservation (Urban et al 2009, Beier et al 2011, Galpern et al 2011, Rayfield et al 2011, including habitat creation, restoration, and reserve design (Kininmonth et al 2011, Clauzel et al 2015, Mimet et al 2016. Only recently has a more formal methodological framework for using graph theory for land-use planning been proposed (Foltête et al 2014).…”
Section: Sobolmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Functional connectivity is the behavioral response to the landscape elements [7]. It can be analyzed by a species' movement behavior in the landscape by testing dispersal success, search time and cell immigration, and comparing movement frequencies and weighing distances between points [8,9]. Previous researches have addressed the definition and application of landscape connectivity especially structural connectivity [7,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%