Lockdown timing and efficacy in controlling COVID-19 using mobile phone tracking

Abstract

Background: Italy's severe COVID-19 outbreak was addressed by a lockdown that gradually increased in space, time and intensity. The effectiveness of the lockdown has not been precisely assessed with respect to the intensity of mobility restriction and the time until the outbreak receded. Methods: We used processed mobile phone tracking data to measure mobility restriction, and related those data to the number of new SARS-CoV-2 positive cases detected on a daily base in the three most affected Italian regions, Lombardy, Veneto and Emilia-Romagna, from February 1 through April 6, 2020, when two subsequent lockdowns with increasing intensity were implemented by the Italian government. Findings: During the study period, mobility restriction was inversely related to the daily number of newly diagnosed SARS-CoV-2 positive cases only after the second, more effective lockdown, with a peak in the curve of diagnosed cases of infection occurring 14 to 18 days from lockdown in the three regions and 9 to 25 days in the included provinces. An effective reduction in transmission must have occurred nearly immediately after the tighter lockdown, given the lag time of around 10 days from asymptomatic infection to diagnosis. The period from lockdown to peak was shorter in the areas with the highest prevalence of the infection. This effect was seen within slightly more than one week in the most severely affected areas. Interpretation: It appears that the less rigid lockdown led to an insufficient decrease in mobility to reverse an outbreak such as COVID-19. With a tighter lockdown, mobility decreased enough to bring down transmission promptly below the level needed to sustain the epidemic. Funding: No funding sources have been used for this work.

Chasing the ghost of infection past: identifying thresholds of change during the COVID-19 infection in Spain

“…These stronger isolation policies were probably instrumental in flattening the curve of infections, though not sufficient to bring it to a complete halt. Similar to this case, strong lockdowns involving the enforcement of stringent restrictions to personal movements, use of public spaces, non-essential economic activities and in-office work have successfully contained the spread of COVID-19 in many countries and regions [28,[35][36][37][38][39][40]. Indeed, comparisons between related countries evidence that stricter lockdown policies reduce the number of COVID-19 deaths [41].…”

Estimating the impacts of lockdown on Covid-19 cases in Nigeria

“…Relatedly, studies on social distancing and the spread of COVID-19 cases include De Vos (2020) , Freedman et al (2020) , Schueller et al, (2020) , Musinguzi and Asamoah, (2020) , Vinceti et al (2020) , and Zhang et al (2020) . These studies only focused on countries from the developed and emerging nations, implying that little or nothing is on record concerning the African countries.…”

Investigating the Prevalence of Reactive Online Searching in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Infoveillance Study

“…In some countries, strict enforcement of social distancing may not have been necessary due to greater compliance with guidelines (Germany). Alternatively, social distancing may not have been so heavily emphasized or adhered to in some countries, resulting in government-enforced curfews with fines for noncompliance, as experienced in Italy [ 46 , 47 ]. Regardless, clear and repeated guidance should be provided by governments to ensure compliance by their citizens.…”