2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(03)00008-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locked-in syndrome: improvement in the prognosis after an early intensive multidisciplinary rehabilitation11No commercial party having a direct financial interest in the results of the research supporting this article has or will confer a benefit upon the author(s) or upon any organization with which the author(s) is/are associated.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

4
27
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 84 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
4
27
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The severity of motor impairment was assessed using the Patterson & Grabois scale [3], [65]. This is a 5 points scale ranging from 0 (no recovery- no return of motor function and total dependence in all activities of daily living) to 5 (no neurologic deficit).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The severity of motor impairment was assessed using the Patterson & Grabois scale [3], [65]. This is a 5 points scale ranging from 0 (no recovery- no return of motor function and total dependence in all activities of daily living) to 5 (no neurologic deficit).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The youngest patients have a better prognosis for survival, with more than 85% of individuals still living ten years after onset. 5, 6 With advances in medical technology, life expectancy will likely increase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The FIM has floor effects in highly dependent individuals, which was particularly evident in this case warranting the need for more sensitive measures [13]. Research supports that an early and intensive multidisciplinary treatment plan for patients with LIS, begun within one month of onset, improved health status and decreased the chances for mortality [24] Even still, access to an inpatient rehabilitation team is limited and when provided the opportunity, pressure exists for early discharge leading to higher chances of institutionalization [13, 26]. Literature continues to support that lifelong costs are lowest following TBI with supervised home placement after rehabilitation [1].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…The patient was further able to make decisions and direct her care, increasing her current and future autonomy. This is of great significance as these patients are often placed in long-term care facilities and at the same time are living longer [24]. Considering lifelong costs has become more important due to the reported longer life expectancy in those with LIS, understanding that up to 83% will live ten years after onset [11, 25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%