2017
DOI: 10.1109/jestpe.2017.2698446
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locking Frequency Band Detection Method for Islanding Protection of Distribution Generation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The present technique has been tested using both standards. Apart from the speed, the proposed technique does not need OVP/UVP or OFP/UFP [13,16,19]. The technique does not affect the power quality as much: in [13], the THD is higher than that obtained with the presented technique.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Pvs With The Islanding Detection Module Usmentioning
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The present technique has been tested using both standards. Apart from the speed, the proposed technique does not need OVP/UVP or OFP/UFP [13,16,19]. The technique does not affect the power quality as much: in [13], the THD is higher than that obtained with the presented technique.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Pvs With The Islanding Detection Module Usmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Nevertheless, its implementation is quite simple. It can be the simplest and cheapest active method among the five, at the opposite of [19] which need precise and robust PLL to extract the main criterion of that technique. Moreover, filtering operations can go on, and remote signals transmission or perturbation in the grid could trigger false islanding detection.…”
Section: Simulation Of the Pvs With The Islanding Detection Module Usmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These methods usually inject a perturbation into the system and monitor the output power variations, active frequency drifts, and phase of the voltage at a point of common coupling (PCC) in islanding mode [27]. The dominant active techniques includes active frequency drift (AFD) [28], second harmonic drift [29], frequency jump [30], locking frequency band [31], active frequency drift with positive feedback [32], high frequency signal injection [33], and current injection [34,35]. Despite their effectiveness in islanding detection, active techniques need to continuously vary the DG output, which negatively affects power quality (PQ) and speed of detection while compromising the reliability of islanding detection at the PCC.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%