2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) 2018
DOI: 10.1109/icra.2018.8460929
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotion Envelopes for Adaptive Control of Powered Ankle Prostheses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Lower limb: the use of impedance based control strategies in CDRRs assisting patients with the lower limb disabilities is also reported by [100], Powered Ankle Prostheses [102], String Man [106], and LOPES [95], [96], [97].…”
Section: ) Force-based Impedance Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 77%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Lower limb: the use of impedance based control strategies in CDRRs assisting patients with the lower limb disabilities is also reported by [100], Powered Ankle Prostheses [102], String Man [106], and LOPES [95], [96], [97].…”
Section: ) Force-based Impedance Control Strategymentioning
confidence: 77%
“…Target movements for rehabilitation: Most of the lower limb CDRRs are designed to assist all the joints of the lower limb; hip, knee and ankle joints. There are however some CDRRs to assist only one or two lower limb joints, such as, Powered Ankle Prostheses [102] and C-ALEX [98] that are proposed to assist the rehabilitation of ankle joint and hipknee joints, respectively. The categorization of lower limb CDRRs based on number of target joints for rehabilitation is shown in Table 8.…”
Section: B Cable-driven Robots For Lower Limbsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Too fast or too slow motion of robotic device would make a conflict with the intact limb and bring another disturbance to the torso. The conventional trajectory following method, such as position (Scherillo et al, 2003) or impedance trajectory (Dhir et al, 2018), is not suitable in standing push-recovery task because there is no obvious rhythm motion and torque-angle relationship varies with unpredictable external disturbance. The impedance control-based algorithm is preferred in such a case.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, the muscle activity of the tibialis anterior (TA), peroneus longus (PL), soleus (SOL), and gastrocnemius (GA) muscles were measured and sampled at 2000 Hz. These muscles were selected based on their contribution to ankle stabilization and rotation [15]. The EMG signals were low-passed filtered by the Delsys filtering software to reduce motion artifact.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The mechanical impedance defines how much reactive torque the ankle generates when an external disturbance changes the ankle angle. Some prostheses are capable of modulating the ankle impedance [8]- [15] and experimental devices were developed to test the accuracy of this modulation [16], [17]. A good approach to control these prostheses would be to modulate the same ankle mechanical impedance of the amputee prior to the amputation.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%