2011
DOI: 10.1152/jn.00342.2010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Locomotor-activated neurons of the cat. II. Noradrenergic innervation and colocalization with NEα1a or NEα2b receptors in the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord

Abstract: Norepinephrine (NE) is a strong modulator and/or activator of spinal locomotor networks. Thus noradrenergic fibers likely contact neurons involved in generating locomotion. The aim of the present study was to investigate the noradrenergic innervation of functionally related, locomotor-activated neurons within the thoraco-lumbar spinal cord. This was accomplished by immunohistochemical colocalization of noradrenergic fibers using dopamine-β-hydroxylase or NEα(1A) and NEα(2B) receptors with cells expressing the … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
31
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 123 publications
1
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is probable that noradrenergic inputs are important regulators of interlimb coordination in the intact state. Furthermore, commissural interneurons interposed in crossed reflex pathways are located in laminae VI–VIII in the cat (Edgley et al 2003; Hammar et al 2004, 2007; Jankowska et al 2009), regions that are densely packed with locomotor‐related α 2 ‐noradrenergic receptors (Noga et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is probable that noradrenergic inputs are important regulators of interlimb coordination in the intact state. Furthermore, commissural interneurons interposed in crossed reflex pathways are located in laminae VI–VIII in the cat (Edgley et al 2003; Hammar et al 2004, 2007; Jankowska et al 2009), regions that are densely packed with locomotor‐related α 2 ‐noradrenergic receptors (Noga et al 2011).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This showed immunohistochemical signals of β 2 -AR in at least four different locations: (1) larger blood vessels (not depicted), (2) motoneurons (Figures 5A,B), (3) muscle fibers (Figure 5E, left panel), and (4) ill-defined anastomotic fibers (Figure 5E, on left panel see central part of the picture). Since the presence of β 2 -AR had been found by staining and anticipated to be present due to functional roles in blood vessels (Daly and McGrath, 2011), motoneurons (Melamed et al, 1976; Wohlberg et al, 1986; Bondok et al, 1988; Adachi et al, 1992; Parkis et al, 1995; Zeman et al, 2004; Tartas et al, 2010; Noga et al, 2011; Baker and Baker, 2012) and muscle fibers (Gross et al, 1976; Cairns and Dulhunty, 1993a,b; Cairns et al, 1993; Kokate et al, 1993; Navegantes et al, 1999, 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004; Prakash et al, 1999; Decostre et al, 2000; Gonçalves et al, 2012), our findings in wildtype muscles were corroborating previous reports. However, the difference between wildtype and dystrophic mdx muscles was striking, both with respect to neuronal as well as muscle staining: First, while the typical pretzel-shaped postsynaptic AChR signals in wildtype muscle were perfectly mirrored by presynaptic β 2 -AR staining (Figures 5A,B) in almost fibers, this was much rarer the case in mdx synapses (Figures 5C,D), which were also highly fragmented as reported previously (Torres and Duchen, 1987; Lyons and Slater, 1991; Grady et al, 2000).…”
Section: On the Origin And Destination Of Catecholamines In Skeletal mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This showed immunohistochemical signals of β 2 -AR in at least four different locations: (1) larger blood vessels (not depicted), (2) motoneurons (Figures 5A,B), (3) muscle fibers ( Figure 5E, left panel), and (4) ill-defined anastomotic fibers ( Figure 5E, on left panel see central part of the picture). Since the presence of β 2 -AR had been found by staining and anticipated to be present due to functional roles in blood vessels (Daly and McGrath, 2011), motoneurons (Melamed et al, 1976;Wohlberg et al, 1986;Bondok et al, 1988;Adachi et al, 1992;Parkis et al, 1995;Zeman et al, 2004;Tartas et al, 2010;Noga et al, 2011;Baker and Baker, 2012) and muscle fibers (Gross et al, 1976;Cairns and Dulhunty, 1993a,b;Cairns et al, 1993;Kokate et al, 1993;Navegantes et al, 1999Navegantes et al, , 2000Navegantes et al, , 2001Navegantes et al, , 2002Navegantes et al, , 2003Navegantes et al, , 2004Prakash et al, 1999;Decostre et al, 2000;Gonçalves et al, 2012), our findings in wildtype muscles were corroborating previous reports. However, the difference between wildtype and dystrophic mdx muscles was striking, both with respect to neuronal as well as muscle staining: First, while the typical pretzel-shaped postsynaptic AChR signals in wildtype muscle were perfectly mirrored by presynaptic β 2 -AR staining ( Figures 5A,B) in almost fibers, this was much rarer the case in mdx synapses (Figures 5C,D), which were also highly fragmented as reported previously (Torres and Duchen, 1987;Lyons and Slater, 1991;Grady et al, 2000).…”
Section: On the Origin And Destination Of Catecholamines In Skeletal supporting
confidence: 90%