Logical Pluralism from a Pragmatic Perspective

Kissel, Teresa Kouri

doi:10.1080/00048402.2017.1399151

Cited by 15 publications

(6 citation statements)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Their paper provides a sharp and elegant characterization of metainferential validity and their main result allows us to translate the question of whether some metainference holds in ST + into a question about whether some related inference holds in LP + . 16 In addition to this, Barrio, Rosenblatt and Tajer take the results in their paper to argue for two claims (these claims appear intertwined in the paper): Claim 1: That, contrary to what it is claimed in Cobreros et al [9], ST + is not classical logic.…”

Section: Lp + In Sheep's Clothing?mentioning

confidence: 96%

“…Barrio et al [4] suggest that it requires us to endorse logical pluralism. We take no stand here on the debate around logical pluralism (see eg [6,16,24]). But whether or not logical pluralism is correct, it would certainly be awkward if we were forced, merely by our advocacy of ST + , also to advocate logical pluralism.…”

Section: Making Sense Of Barrio Et Al's Desideratummentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Inferences and Metainferences in ST

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In a recent paper, Barrio, Tajer and Rosenblatt establish a correspondence between metainferences holding in the strict-tolerant logic of transparent truth ST+ and inferences holding in the logic of paradox LP+. They argue that LP+ is ST+’s external logic and they question whether ST+’s solution to the semantic paradoxes is fundamentally different from LP+’s. Here we establish that by parity of reasoning, ST+ can be related to LP+’s dual logic K+. We clarify the distinction between internal and external logic and argue that while ST+’s nonclassicality can be granted, its self-dual character does not tie it to LP+ more closely than to K+.

show abstract

Section: Lp + In Sheep's Clothing?mentioning

confidence: 96%

Section: Making Sense Of Barrio Et Al's Desideratummentioning

confidence: 99%

Inferences and Metainferences in ST

et al. 2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Most of them rely on relativising the normatively relevant logic to some plausible parameter. Some authors choose this parameter to be the context [Caret, 2017;Kouri Kissel, 2018], some choose it to be the epistemic goal or purpose [Blake-Turner and Russell, 2021], and yet other choose it to be the domain of inquiry (physics, economics, etc.) [Hjortland, 2017].…”

Section: The Collapse Argumentmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Guest Editors: H. Antunes and D. Szmuc various different kinds of truth bearers [Russell, 2008]. Others have suggested that there is a plurality of correct logics because there are various legitimate choices as to which are the logical constants of natural language [Varzi, 2002], or alternatively, various ways to make precise the meaning of these constants [Kouri Kissel, 2018]. Finally, some authors have claimed that there is a plurality of correct logics because there are various ways to make precise the meaning of the vernacular predicate "follows deductively from" [Beall and Restall, 2006;Cook, 2010].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems

Tajer¹,

Fiore

2022

LLP

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Logical pluralism is a general idea that there is more than one correct logic. Carnielli and Rodrigues [2019a] defend an epistemic interpretation of the paraconsistent logic N4, according to which an argument is valid in this logic just in case it necessarily preserves evidence. The authors appeal to this epistemic interpretation to briefly motivate a kind of logical pluralism: “different accounts of logical consequence may preserve different properties of propositions”. The aim of this paper is to study the prospect of a logical pluralism based on different interpretations of logical systems. First, we give our analysis of what it means to interpret a logic – and make some hopefully useful distinctions along the way. Second, we present what we call an interpretational logical pluralism: there is more than one correct logic and a logic is correct only if it has some adequate interpretation. We consider four variants of this idea, bring up some possible objections, and try to find plausible solutions on behalf of the pluralist. We will argue that interpretations of logical systems provide a promising – albeit not unproblematic – route to logical pluralism.

show abstract

“…Trying to understand a discipline from different scientific values is a new way to do, which can make stronger interdisciplinary and transdisciplinary approaches. Bringing back analytic philosophy and other philosophical schools discussions into the framework of the pluralist spirit emerging lastly in science and logic [74,75] is relevant for building a new analysis, and should no longer be an elitist dialogue, but a relevant one with a wide participation of the scientific community.…”

Section: Wide Knowledge Discovery Strategy Towards Aa Paradigm: Philosophical Cognitive and Strategic Argumentsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Transdisciplinary Scientific Strategies for Soft Computing Development: Towards an Era of Data and Business Analytics

Andrade

Pedrycz

Solares

et al. 2021

Axioms

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This research is a review and analysis paper that offers a transdisciplinary, methodological, and strategic vision for soft computing development towards a wider favorable impact in data analytics. Strategies are defined, explained, and illustrated by examples. The paper also shows how these strategies are expressed in three dimensions of an ambitious actions plan. They are all integrated into a master strategy called wide knowledge discovery, which offers a way towards the augmented analytics paradigm. Some contributions of this work are defining what kind of mathematical elements should be introduced into soft computing towards a better impact on the area of data analytics, offering orientation towards building new mathematical elements, and defining why and how they can be introduced.

show abstract

Logical Pluralism from a Pragmatic Perspective

Cited by 15 publications

References 16 publications

Inferences and Metainferences in ST

Inferences and Metainferences in ST

Logical Pluralism and Interpretations of Logical Systems

Transdisciplinary Scientific Strategies for Soft Computing Development: Towards an Era of Data and Business Analytics

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About