2010
DOI: 10.1177/0261018309358292
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Lone motherhood, welfare reform and active citizen subjectivity

Abstract: Lone motherhood, welfare reform and active citizen subjectivityAbstract Welfare-to-work policies have become a central priority of governments in Canada, the US, the UK, Australia and Scandinavia. Drawing on multiple in-depth interviews generated as part of a longitudinal qualitative study, we explore how welfare is imbricated in lone mothers' subjectivity and citizenship. We consider women's everyday claims-making activities as we interrogate three dimensions of welfare reform in British Columbia, Canada: (i)… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
(10 reference statements)
0
43
2
Order By: Relevance
“…As such, discourses of responsibility have become entrenched in systems and emphasis on personal responsibility for health has obscured the role of systems as health inequities proliferate. There has been some attention given to the importance of context and the impact of neo-liberalism in relation to marginalizing discourses in health care that blame individuals for poor health outcomes and further stigmatize individuals for behaviors such as drug use or poverty, or on the basis of gender or ethnic associations (e.g., Anderson et al 2009;Bungay et al 2009;Klodawsky et al 2006;Pauly et al 2009;Pulkingham et al 2010).We suggest that these same conditions are impacting providers and the development of moral distress. In the same way that individuals are blamed for their poor health so are health care providers found to be weak or failing when moral distress is constructed as primarily an individual concern.…”
Section: Contextual Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…As such, discourses of responsibility have become entrenched in systems and emphasis on personal responsibility for health has obscured the role of systems as health inequities proliferate. There has been some attention given to the importance of context and the impact of neo-liberalism in relation to marginalizing discourses in health care that blame individuals for poor health outcomes and further stigmatize individuals for behaviors such as drug use or poverty, or on the basis of gender or ethnic associations (e.g., Anderson et al 2009;Bungay et al 2009;Klodawsky et al 2006;Pauly et al 2009;Pulkingham et al 2010).We suggest that these same conditions are impacting providers and the development of moral distress. In the same way that individuals are blamed for their poor health so are health care providers found to be weak or failing when moral distress is constructed as primarily an individual concern.…”
Section: Contextual Tensionsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…From a feminist perspective, considering these women solely as wage earners simply needing employment to move out of poverty (Pulkingham, Fuller, & Kershaw, 2010) ignores their social realities as lone mothers, making the circumstances and social significance of their mother-work simultaneously both invisible and morally incriminating.…”
Section: Sonjamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some instances, in what might be hard to construct as only a micro-assault, the women described being threatened with losing the care and custody of their children. By individualizing and personalizing women's poverty such that it is their failure to get a job, secure child support from fathers, or better manage insufficient incomes, lone mothers are denigrated, pathologized, and rendered invisible (Grabham & Smith;2010;Power, 2005;Pulkingham et al, 2010), while the hegemonic patriarchal structures that devalue women, mothering, and caring labor are maintained.…”
Section: Bellementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Active citizenship can be a very ambiguous term, especially since becoming embedded in the debate on rights versus responsibilities, particularly for social assistance recipients (Clarke 2005;Lister 2002;Pulkingham, Fuller, and Kershaw, 2010). The assumption is that to be an active citizen one must exercise both rights and responsibilities.…”
Section: Active Citizenship and Agencymentioning
confidence: 99%