2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.09.035
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist versus short agonist versus antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized controlled trial

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

6
64
1
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 97 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
6
64
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…While there may be criticism on the use of long agonist protocol for predicted poor responders in our study, instead of short agonist or antagonist protocol, there is no evidence to support the use of one particular protocol to another in women with low ovarian reserve (46)(47)(48)(49). In fact, one recent RCT has shown an improved ovarian response with the use of long protocol compared to short agonist protocol and similar response in comparison to antagonist protocol (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…While there may be criticism on the use of long agonist protocol for predicted poor responders in our study, instead of short agonist or antagonist protocol, there is no evidence to support the use of one particular protocol to another in women with low ovarian reserve (46)(47)(48)(49). In fact, one recent RCT has shown an improved ovarian response with the use of long protocol compared to short agonist protocol and similar response in comparison to antagonist protocol (49).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…In fact, one recent RCT has shown an improved ovarian response with the use of long protocol compared to short agonist protocol and similar response in comparison to antagonist protocol (49). Further, this study was planned to minimally disrupt our standard clinical practice and the NURTURE fertility clinic has been using the long agonist protocol for the majority of patients with satisfactory live birth rates of 37.3%, 13.3% in women aged 38-39 and 40-42, respectively (50).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, a low number of oocytes after such stimulation may constitute a normal response, resulting in low pregnancy rate, that's what concluded from randomized controlled trial study design done by some group when compared the efficacy of the long GnRH agonist vs. the short GnRH agonist vs. the GnRH antagonist regimens in poor responders undergoing IVF (16) .Gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonist and short agonist stimulation protocol has shorter duration of treatment and less gonadotropin use, table (2). GnRH long agonist protocol is better in folliculogenesis and pregnancy rate, which is the imperative goal of COH.…”
Section: Results:-mentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Another limitation might be the existence of two conventional protocols, representing the control group. This could be justified by the standard policy of our Unit to use both protocols for this category of patients and due to the fact that both protocols appear to be equal in terms of success rates when applied to poor responders (5,8,9,37). We also fully acknowledge the difference in terms of oocyte quality and quantity when stimulated between poor responders at a young and advanced age, or those with different phenotypes: again here, the sample size warranted would be much higher and the conducting of this study much longer.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%