2019 European Conference on Mobile Robots (ECMR) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/ecmr.2019.8870952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Horizon Active SLAM system for multi-agent coordinated exploration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Schlotfeldt et al [224] introduce an anytime search-based planning formulation that progressively reduces the suboptimality of the multi-agent plans while respecting real-time constraints. Instead of using search-based planning, Ossenkopf et al [225] generate candidate robot actions using RRT*. The sampling is biased to prioritize exploration, map improvement, or localization improvement.…”
Section: Multi-robot Active Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schlotfeldt et al [224] introduce an anytime search-based planning formulation that progressively reduces the suboptimality of the multi-agent plans while respecting real-time constraints. Instead of using search-based planning, Ossenkopf et al [225] generate candidate robot actions using RRT*. The sampling is biased to prioritize exploration, map improvement, or localization improvement.…”
Section: Multi-robot Active Slammentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These parameters are entropy, KLD, localization info, visual features, and frontier points. In addition to these parameters, AC-SLAM parameters may include (a) the parameters presented by the authors of [86,87], incorporating the multirobot constraints induced by adding the future robot paths while minimizing the optimal control function (which takes into account the future steps and observations) and minimizing the robot state and map uncertainty and adding them into the belief space (assumed to be Gaussian); (b) parameters relating to exploration and relocalization (to gather at a predefined meeting position) phase of robots as described by [88]; (c) 3D mapping info (OctoMap) used by the authors of [89]; and (d) path and map entropy info, as used in [90], and relative entropy, as mentioned in [91]. Relative observation between agents [88] N Localization utility, information gain, cost of navigation [93] N Visual features, map points [94] Weak edges in pose graphs of target agents [95] Frontier points and map information [96] N Localization utility, information gain, cost of navigation [89] N Visual features, optimized paths [90] N Pose and map entropy, Kullback-Leibler divergence [91] Relative pose entropy [97] Visual features, chained localization [87] Multirobot belief evolution by incorporating mutual observations and future measurements [98] N Frontier points and frontier-to-robot distances [99] N Frontiers and relative-position estimates [100] N, Entropy and future measurements [101] N, Information vector and information matrix 1 Centralized.…”
Section: Active Collaborative Slam (Ac-slam)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schlotfeldt et al [214] introduce an anytime search-based planning formulation that progressively reduces the suboptimality of the multi-agent plans while respecting real-time constraints. Instead of using search-based planning, Ossenkopf et al [215] generate candidate robot actions using RRT*. The sampling is biased to prioritize exploration, map improvement, or localization improvement.…”
Section: Multi-robot Active Slammentioning
confidence: 99%