2016
DOI: 10.5194/acp-16-13149-2016
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term assessment of airborne radiocesium after the Fukushima nuclear accident: re-suspension from bare soil and forest ecosystems

Abstract: Abstract. The long-term effect of 137 Cs re-suspension from contaminated soil and forests due to the Fukushima nuclear accident has been quantitatively assessed by numerical simulation, a field experiment on dust emission flux in a contaminated area (town of Namie, Fukushima prefecture), and air concentration measurements inside (Namie) and outside (city of Tsukuba, Ibaraki prefecture) the contaminated area. In order to assess the long-term effect, the full year of 2013 was selected to study just after the sta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
60
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(63 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
2
60
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These concentrations are at least two orders of magnitude higher than those observed in East Japan before the FDNPP accident (~1 μBq/m 3 ; Igarashi et al 2015). Several studies showed that this atmospheric radiocesium could not be attributed to the direct emissions/leakage from the FDNPP site (e.g., Igarashi et al 2015;Kajino et al 2016) but could be supplied by secondary emissions of the deposited radiocesium, which is called resuspension to the atmosphere (e.g., Igarashi 2009;Igarashi et al 2015;Kajino et al 2016). Igarashi et al (2015) concluded that the delayed primary emissions from the FDNPP could not be a major source of the current (till March 2015) radiocesium in the atmosphere based on the atmospheric observations in Tsukuba and the emission inventory data from Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. (TEPCO) (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…These concentrations are at least two orders of magnitude higher than those observed in East Japan before the FDNPP accident (~1 μBq/m 3 ; Igarashi et al 2015). Several studies showed that this atmospheric radiocesium could not be attributed to the direct emissions/leakage from the FDNPP site (e.g., Igarashi et al 2015;Kajino et al 2016) but could be supplied by secondary emissions of the deposited radiocesium, which is called resuspension to the atmosphere (e.g., Igarashi 2009;Igarashi et al 2015;Kajino et al 2016). Igarashi et al (2015) concluded that the delayed primary emissions from the FDNPP could not be a major source of the current (till March 2015) radiocesium in the atmosphere based on the atmospheric observations in Tsukuba and the emission inventory data from Tokyo Electric Power Co., Inc. (TEPCO) (2012).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…In this study, the sampling sites are located in low mountainous areas and are surrounded by forests, and thus, it is natural that the increases of bioaerosols significantly contribute to resuspension, unlike in urban areas. Kajino et al (2016) simulated resuspension from the soil (Ishizuka et al 2017) and that from vegetation (details were showed in the "Introduction" section), succeeding in reconstructing the 137 Cs activity concentration levels that we observed. In their results, most of atmospheric 137 Cs in summer/autumn was supplied by biogenic emissions, which is consistent with our results.…”
Section: Possible Host Particles For Radiocesium Resuspensionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations