1994
DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.pcp.a078633
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Chilling of Young Tomato Plants under Low Light. IV. Differential Responses of Chlorophyll Fluorescence Quenching Coefficients in Lycopersicon Species of Different Chilling Sensitivity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is likely that the light intensity in our experiment was too low to induce enough formation of reactive oxygen species to damage the PSII. Sharp decreases in Rubisco content and initial Rubisco activity were found in tomato plants after exposure to a chill under low light intensity (Brüggemann and Linger, 1994). Meanwhile, several other studies on tomato and mango have also identified the primary low light and dark chill-induced lesions in photosynthesis to be Calvin cycle enzymes, like SBPase, FBPase (Sassenrath et al, 1990;Hutchison et al, 2000), Rubisco (Kingston-Smith et al, 1999;Allen et al, 2000), and stomatal supply of CO 2 (Allen et al, 2000;Hu and Yu, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is likely that the light intensity in our experiment was too low to induce enough formation of reactive oxygen species to damage the PSII. Sharp decreases in Rubisco content and initial Rubisco activity were found in tomato plants after exposure to a chill under low light intensity (Brüggemann and Linger, 1994). Meanwhile, several other studies on tomato and mango have also identified the primary low light and dark chill-induced lesions in photosynthesis to be Calvin cycle enzymes, like SBPase, FBPase (Sassenrath et al, 1990;Hutchison et al, 2000), Rubisco (Kingston-Smith et al, 1999;Allen et al, 2000), and stomatal supply of CO 2 (Allen et al, 2000;Hu and Yu, 2001).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…As a thermophilic species, tomato is very susceptible to chilling temperatures (0-12 1C). Generally, high-altitude accessions of wild tomato species like Lycopersicon hirsutum, L. chilense and L. peruvianum show a higher level of chilling tolerance, as indicated by a greater post-chilling re-growth capacity, and less severe inhibition in photosynthesis than the cultivated tomato L. esculentum (Brüggemann and Linger, 1994;Jung and Steffen, 1997;Venema et al, 1999). The latter difference is attributed to the higher capacity of the Calvin cycle of wild tomato at suboptimal temperatures, resulting in a more oxidized state of Q A , the primary electron acceptor of PS II (Brüggemann et al, 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…S. lycopersicum is relatively tolerant of low temperature for a cold-sensitive species (Yamori et al, 2009b), but variation in cold tolerance has been reported for a given species (Brü ggemann and Linger, 1994;Saruyama and Tanida, 1995;Yu et al, 2002).…”
Section: Discussion Interspecific Variation In Temperature Acclimatiomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Unlike the cultivated tomato, wild species, especially Solanum habrochaites S.Knapp & D.M.Spooner, are adapted to a wide range of latitudinal distribution and show favorable characteristics to plant development and growth even when thermal conditions are not so favorable during the day or along the cycle (Brüggemann & Linger, 1994).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%