2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.transproceed.2009.03.052
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Clinical Impact of Vesicoureteral Reflux in Kidney Transplantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
1
5

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
1
22
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Favi et al compared 15 recipients with VUR to 22 without [32]. Each patient had at least one urinary tract infection (UTI) per year and was more than 2 years out from transplant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Favi et al compared 15 recipients with VUR to 22 without [32]. Each patient had at least one urinary tract infection (UTI) per year and was more than 2 years out from transplant.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, the evidence available is poor and mainly derived from very small and underpowered studies, thus limiting data interpretation. In a small cohort series of 37 renal transplant patients, Favi et al (19) found no effect of VUR on graft survival or renal function at 5 years, as indicated by VCUG. The reported VUR incidence of 41% (15/37 patients) is in accordance with our findings.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, the actual impact of this condition has been a subject of ongoing debate (19,22,(26)(27)(28)(29)(30). To the best of our knowledge, this study is the largest series of deceased and living donor kidney allograft recipients in which the effect of early VUR on the incidence of UTI, rejection rates, and graft and patient survival was analyzed.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations