2002
DOI: 10.1002/dev.10091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term effects of infant rearing condition on the acquisition of dominance rank in juvenile and adult rhesus macaques (Macaca mulatta)

Abstract: We examined the effects of early rearing experience on the development of dominance status in 53 juvenile (age 3) and then in 38 adult (ages 5-8) rhesus macaques. Based on previous research investigating the behavioral outcomes of nursery-rearing, we predicted that mother-reared (MR) monkeys would outrank peer-only reared (PR) monkeys, which would in turn outrank surrogate/peer-reared (SPR) subjects. Juvenile MR and PR subjects did not differ in ranks, but monkeys from both rearing backgrounds outranked SPR ca… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

9
70
1
1

Year Published

2004
2004
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 96 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
9
70
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…All females in the present study lost body weight over the course of 7 weeks but the decrease was greater in subordinate females, regardless of SERT genotype. These rank-related differences in body weight are similar to those observed following the formation of groups of juvenile macaques [65]. The most parsimonious explanation for this effect is that food intake was suppressed during this time period; however, other rodent data suggest that the maintenance of lower body weights resulting from repeated restraint stress is not explained by persistent hypophagia but reflects an adaptation to a new body weight set point [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All females in the present study lost body weight over the course of 7 weeks but the decrease was greater in subordinate females, regardless of SERT genotype. These rank-related differences in body weight are similar to those observed following the formation of groups of juvenile macaques [65]. The most parsimonious explanation for this effect is that food intake was suppressed during this time period; however, other rodent data suggest that the maintenance of lower body weights resulting from repeated restraint stress is not explained by persistent hypophagia but reflects an adaptation to a new body weight set point [41].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 68%
“…There was more variance in body mass measures and T3 concentrations in l/l females compared to svariant females at baseline when social ranks were similar. Body weight has been shown to be a predictor of eventual dominant status in some reports [81] but not others [Bastian, 2003No. 1810, suggesting that appreciably larger animals may elicit submissive responsiveness from smaller cage mates.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We have extended our original study (Prather et al, 2001) by increasing the number of subjects, including a hippocampus lesion group, and raising the infants in a social environment. The infants were reared by their mothers and given daily access to other monkeys to simulate features of the social organization of free-ranging macaques (Berman, 1980), which appear necessary to facilitate species-typical social and hormonal development (Mason, 1960;Mason and Sponholz, 1963;Shannon et al, 1998;Bastian et al, 2003;Winslow et al, 2003). Thus, any observed alterations in social behavior can be more reasonably ascribed to the effects of the amygdala damage, rather than to atypical rearing conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…child development | social dominance | stress | mental health A cts of dominance and subordination are the most universal, prototypical features of the hierarchical social organization that characterizes much of invertebrate to vertebrate phylogeny, from roundworms (1) and fruit flies (2) to cichlid fish (3), nonhuman primates (4,5), and human children (6)(7)(8)(9). Across these diverse species, group organization is shaped by ordered, linearly transitive social relationships, the evolutionary emergence of which has been variably attributed to the adaptive advantages of divisions of labor and social roles (10), cooperative breeding (11), leadership provision (9,12), checks on aggression (13), and/or constraining disease transmission (14).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%