Long-term Effects of Pancreatic Transplant Function in Patients with Advanced Juvenile-onset Diabetes

Gliedman, Marvin L.; Tellis, Vivian A.; Soberman, Robert; Rifkin, Harold; Veith, Frank J.

doi:10.2337/diacare.1.1.1

Cited by 68 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…20 This was the longest functioning pancreas graft in the world until a series of SPK segmental transplants drained into the ureter by Gliedman et al, 26 beginning in the early 1970s, produced a recipient whose new pancreas functioned (insulin-independent) for 5 years.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons Learned From More Than 1,000 Pancreas Transplants at a Single Institution

Sutherland¹,

Gruessner²,

Dünn³

et al. 2001

Annals of Surgery

615

434

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

ObjectiveTo determine outcome in diabetic pancreas transplant recipients according to risk factors and the surgical techniques and immunosuppressive protocols that evolved during a 33-year period at a single institution. Summary Background DataInsulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is associated with a high incidence of management problems and secondary complications. Clinical pancreas transplantation began at the University of Minnesota in 1966, initially with a high failure rate, but outcome improved in parallel with other organ transplants. The authors retrospectively analyzed the factors associated with the increased success rate of pancreas transplants. MethodsFrom December 16, 1966, to March 31, 2000, the authors performed 1,194 pancreas transplants (111 from living donors; 191 retransplants): 498 simultaneous pancreas-kidney (SPK) and 1 simultaneous pancreas-liver transplant; 404 pancreas after kidney (PAK) transplants; and 291 pancreas transplants alone (PTA). The analyses were divided into five eras: era 0, 1966 to 1973 (n ϭ 14), historical; era 1, 1978 to 1986 (n ϭ 148), transition to cyclosporine for immunosuppression, multiple duct management techniques, and only solitary (PAK and PTA) transplants; era 2, 1986 to 1994 (n ϭ 461), all categories (SPK, PAK, and PTA), predominately bladder drainage for graft duct management, and primarily triple therapy (cyclosporine, azathioprine, and prednisone) for maintenance immunosuppression; era 3, 1994 to 1998 (n ϭ 286), tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil used; and era 4, 1998 to 2000 (n ϭ 275), use of daclizumab for induction immunosuppression, primarily enteric drainage for SPK transplants, pretransplant immunosuppression in candidates awaiting PTA. ResultsPatient and primary cadaver pancreas graft functional (insulinindependence) survival rates at 1 year by category and era were as follows: SPK, era 2 (n ϭ 214) versus eras 3 and 4 combined (n ϭ 212), 85% and 64% versus 92% and 79%, respectively; PAK, era 1 (n ϭ 36) versus 2 (n ϭ 61) versus 3 (n ϭ 84) versus 4 (n ϭ 92), 86% and 17%, 98% and 59%, 98% and 76%, and 98% and 81%, respectively; in PTA, era 1 (n ϭ 36) versus 2 (n ϭ 72) versus 3 (n ϭ 30) versus 4 (n ϭ 40), 77% and 31%, 99% and 50%, 90% and 67%, and 100% and 88%, respectively. In eras 3 and 4 combined for primary cadaver SPK transplants, pancreas graft survival rates were significantly higher with bladder drainage (n ϭ 136) than enteric drainage (n ϭ 70), 82% versus 74% at 1 year (P ϭ .03). Increasing recipient age had an adverse effect on outcome only in SPK recipients. Vascular disease was common (in eras 3 and 4, 27% of SPK recipients had a pretransplant myocardial infarction and 40% had a coronary artery bypass); those with no vascular disease had significantly higher patient and graft survival rates in the SPK and PAK categories. Living donor segmental pancreas transplants were associated with higher technically successful graft survival rates in each era, predominately solitary (PAK and PTA) in eras 1 and 2 and SPK in eras 3 and 4. Diabetic seconda...

show abstract

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Lessons Learned From More Than 1,000 Pancreas Transplants at a Single Institution

Sutherland¹,

Gruessner²,

Dünn³

et al. 2001

Annals of Surgery

615

434

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Gliedman and associates performed a total of 11 ureteral pancreas transplants in the early 1970s ( Fig. 3) with one graft functioning for 22 months and another for 50 months -at that point the longest pancreas graft survival recorded (14,15). However, ureteral drainage did not find widespread application because of tenuous leakage-prone duct-toureter anastomosis ; leakage from the pancreas cut surface ; and the potential need for ipsilateral native nephrectomy.…”

Section: Introduction the Historical Era Of Pancreas Transplantationmentioning

confidence: 98%

The History of Pancreas Transplantation: Past, Present and Future

Squifflet

Gruessner

Sutherland

2008

Acta Chirurgica Belgica

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The first attempt to cure type 1 diabetes by pancreas transplantation was done at the University of Minnesota, in Minneapolis, on December 17, 1966, followed by a series of whole pancreas transplantation. Due to the lack of potent immunosuppressive drugs, rejections and infections, it was concluded that pancreas was less antigenic than the kidney which was less antigenic than the duodenum. It opened the door to a period, between the mid 70's to mid 80's where only segmental pancreatic grafts were used in the recipient. Numerous techniques for diverting or dealing with the pancreas juice secretion were described, none of them being satisfactory. In the late 70's - early 80's, three major events happened and boosted the development of pancreas transplantation: firstly the introduction of Cyclosporine A in the clinical field, secondly the organization on March 1980, of the first international meeting on Pancreas Transplantation with the first report of the International Pancreas Transplantation Registry (IPTR) and finally in 1982, the organization of the first informal so-called Spitzingsee meetings where pancreas transplantation successes but mainly failures were discussed which precluded the onset of IPITA (International Pancreas and Islet Transplantation Association), EuroSPK (European Study Group for simultaneous Pancreas and Kidney Transplantation) and EPITA (European Pancreas and Islet Transplantation Association). During one of the Spitzingsee meetings, participants had the idea to renew the urinary drainage technique of the exocrine secretion of the pancreatic graft with segmental graft and eventually with whole pancreaticoduodenal transplant. That was clinically achieved during the mid 80's and remained the mainstay technique during the next decade. In parallel, the Swedish group developed the whole pancreas transplantation technique with enteric diversion. It was the onset of the whole pancreas reign. The enthusiasm for the technique was rather moderated in its early phase due to the rapid development of liver transplantation and the need for sharing vascular structures between both organs, liver and pancreas. During the modern era of immunosuppression, the whole pancreas transplantation technique with enteric diversion became the gold standard for simultaneous pancreas and kidney transplantation (SPK), with portal drainage of the venous effluent of the pancreas, even for pancreas after kidney (PAK) or pancreas transplantation alone (PTA). Today, there remains room for improvement: safety of using the duodeno-duodenal anastomosis technique must be confirmed by prospective analysis while preventing ischemic reperfusion injuries, using specific drugs; that must be assessed in new trials.

show abstract

“…3) were a research report on the glycemic effects of jet-injected insulin (4), a review of glycemic management in pregnancy complicated by diabetes (5), and an early description of pancreas transplantation (6). Later that year, an article translated from French and reprinted in two parts from Diabete et Metabolisme (7,8) provided impressive albeit somewhat crude evidence suggesting that better glycemic control might reduce the long-term complications of diabetes.…”

Section: S: Off and Runningmentioning

confidence: 99%

The Role of Diabetes Care and Its Contributions to the Field of Diabetes: A Profile in Progress

Reynolds

Genuth

2018

Diabetes Care

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Long-term Effects of Pancreatic Transplant Function in Patients with Advanced Juvenile-onset Diabetes

Cited by 68 publications

References 0 publications

Lessons Learned From More Than 1,000 Pancreas Transplants at a Single Institution

Lessons Learned From More Than 1,000 Pancreas Transplants at a Single Institution

The History of Pancreas Transplantation: Past, Present and Future

The Role of Diabetes Care and Its Contributions to the Field of Diabetes: A Profile in Progress

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About