Surgical treatment in patients suffering from chronic pancreatitis is still discussed controversially. The classical Whipple resection which has been the standard operation in chronic pancreatitis for several decades is continuously replaced by organ-preserving surgical procedures. The pylorus-preserving Whipple resection, a modification of the classical Whipple, and the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection are two competitive operations in patients with chronic pancreatitis and pancreatic head-related complications. A randomized, controlled clinical trial comparing duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection and pylorus-preserving Whipple resection shows that duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection can be carried out in chronic pancreatitis with morbidity and mortality similar to that of the pylorus-preserving Whipple procedure. Furthermore, this study demonstrates the superiority of the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection with regard to postoperative quality of life and glucose metabolism, which are responsible for faster weight gain and convalescence. Delayed gastric emptying and biliary fistulae, which may lead to morbidity following pylorus-preserving Whipple, do not occur after duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection. We conclude from these data that, in comparison with the pylorus-preserving Whipple resection, the duodenum-preserving pancreatic head resection provides better early postoperative outcome and convalescence as well as better preservation of the endocrine function, and should therefore be adopted as a new standard procedure in the treatment of pancreatic head complications in chronic pancreatitis.