2015
DOI: 10.23937/2378-3397/1410021
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Functional Evaluation on Tendon Transfer to Restore Extension of the Thumb using Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis

Abstract: Purpose:To investigate the long-term functional and clinical outcomes of a tendon transfer to restore extension of the thumb using extensor carpi radialis brevis Methods and materials: From Jun 2005 to Sep 2012, 8 patients with rupture or division of extensor pollicis longus (6 males, 2 females; aged 16-52 years, mean age 30 years) underwent a tendon transfer using the extensor carpi radialis brevis to restore extension of the thumb. All patients were assessed by Geldmacher score system, mobility, pinch and gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In this case, the Geldmacher parameters are significantly similar. Moreover, when compared with the results of Bullon et al 21 (Supplemental Table 2) and Yu W et al 22 (Supplemental Table 3), our technique showed that the results of this technique may be overlapping with those of other alternative techniques. Moreover, in respect of extension and flexion deficit of the thumb and extension/flexion in the nonoper-ated case and operated IP, the difference is not significant, except for MP value where the difference is significant (Supplemental Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Clinical Studysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…In this case, the Geldmacher parameters are significantly similar. Moreover, when compared with the results of Bullon et al 21 (Supplemental Table 2) and Yu W et al 22 (Supplemental Table 3), our technique showed that the results of this technique may be overlapping with those of other alternative techniques. Moreover, in respect of extension and flexion deficit of the thumb and extension/flexion in the nonoper-ated case and operated IP, the difference is not significant, except for MP value where the difference is significant (Supplemental Tables 4 and 5).…”
Section: Clinical Studysupporting
confidence: 56%
“…Cauldwell reported the prevalence of EIP tendon variations as much as 16.8%. 11,12 There are several factors affecting the functional outcomes of EIP tendon transfers, the most important being appropriate tension setting. The standard tensioning position in EIP to EPL transfers is full flexion of thumb when wrist in extension and opposition of the thumb was possible while in full extension when the wrist was in flexion ECRL and ECRB are the other options for tendon transfer but there is certain loss on radial side in wrist extension as ECRL and ECRB is an important extensor.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%