1992
DOI: 10.1044/jshr.3505.1126
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Measures of Electrode Impedance and Auditory Thresholds for the Ineraid Cochlear Implant

Abstract: Measures of electrode impedance and of detection thresholds for electrical stimuli were extracted from the records of patients implanted with the Ineraid cochlear prosthesis. An analysis of impedance measures, obtained at 1, 12, 24, and 36 months after surgery, demonstrated (a) a significant decrease in impedance over the first year for electrodes that carried current and (b) significant increases in impedance at 24 and 36 months for electrodes that did not carry current. An analysis of detection thresholds, o… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
30
0
2

Year Published

1995
1995
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(37 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
5
30
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Relative to adults, children demonstrated greater threshold instability during the first few months after implantation, with thresholds typically increasing during that period (Hughes et al, 2001). Although others have reported general, long term, stability of psychophysical measures (e.g., Dorman et al, 1992;Waltzman et al, 1991;Hughes et al, 2001), the ECAP provides an objective measure of the periphery, that unlike psychophysical or central electrophysiological measures is not prone to the effects of neural plasticity or learning. Indeed, ECAP-based measures could conceivably be used as a means of providing baseline measures for assessing central plasticity.…”
Section: Stability Of Evoked Potentials Assessed Over Timementioning
confidence: 93%
“…Relative to adults, children demonstrated greater threshold instability during the first few months after implantation, with thresholds typically increasing during that period (Hughes et al, 2001). Although others have reported general, long term, stability of psychophysical measures (e.g., Dorman et al, 1992;Waltzman et al, 1991;Hughes et al, 2001), the ECAP provides an objective measure of the periphery, that unlike psychophysical or central electrophysiological measures is not prone to the effects of neural plasticity or learning. Indeed, ECAP-based measures could conceivably be used as a means of providing baseline measures for assessing central plasticity.…”
Section: Stability Of Evoked Potentials Assessed Over Timementioning
confidence: 93%
“…For example, using a scaled down DBS electrode in a primate model electrical stimulation resulted in a significant but reversible decrease in impedance magnitude. Electrical impedance changes as a result of electrical stimulation have also been documented in humans with cochlear implants [29,30].…”
Section: Neurostimulation and Impedance Changementioning
confidence: 98%
“…Regarding current delivery, tissue activation volume, and stimulation thresholds, the effect of voltagecontrolled stimulation is dependent on the electrode-tissue interface impedance [9,20,29,35,36]. In one example of impedance changes that might affect voltage-controlled stimulation, transient unusually high electrode impedance has been documented in DBS electrodes reactivated after a period of time, which subsequently normalized spontaneously [32].…”
Section: Clinical Correlations Of Electrode-tissue Impedancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is evident from the data presented in Table 2, where threshold variations for medial arrays are generally greater than for lateral arrays. Some evidence supporting this observation can be found in threshold current reductions over time, reported by PFINGST (1990) (who used arrays that positioned electrode contacts in the region between the modiolus and the middle of the scala tympani) and DORMAN et al (1992) (for patients using the Ineraid cochlear implant), whereas unchanged EABR thresholds over time were reported for Nucleus implant users (BROWN et al, 1995).…”
Section: Highest Potential Deviation and Electric Field Intensity Formentioning
confidence: 74%
“…10-20 kll (DE SAUVAGE et al, 1997;DORMAN et al, 1992), dominates resistive changes caused by encapsulation tissue (roughly hundreds of ohms) in the neighbouring cochlear tissue.…”
Section: Highest Potential Deviation and Electric Field Intensity Formentioning
confidence: 99%