“…In addition, diabetes, insulin therapy, and body mass index were included in a second multiple Cox regression analysis (model 2 with an effect size of 0.109), as musclin has been implicated as a putative target for obesity and associated diseases. 14 , 24 To assess the predictive capacity of musclin in terms of 1‐year cumulative survival, the following variables were included as possible confounders: previous percutaneous coronary intervention, 25 , 26 EuroSCORE II, 8 left ventricular dysfunction, 27 frailty, 28 , 29 atrial fibrillation, 30 NTproBNP, 31 high‐sensitivity troponin T, 32 absence of preexisting AR, 33 , 34 chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 35 arterial hypertension, peripheral artery disease, 36 albumin level, 37 age, sex, 38 , 39 body mass index, 40 , 41 diabetes, 24 , 42 and insulin therapy 43 . For exploratory purposes, we further estimated improved risk stratification by log‐rank test for linear trend to compare survival curves based on dichotomized circulating musclin and clinical risk: (1) higher musclin level (≥2.862 ng/mL) and low clinical risk (EuroSCORE II <4%); (2) higher musclin level (≥2.862 ng/mL) and intermediate EuroSCORE II; (3) lower musclin level (<2.862 ng/mL) and low EuroSCORE II; and (4) lower musclin level (<2.862 ng/mL) and intermediate EuroSCORE II.…”