2019
DOI: 10.1093/ehjci/jez067
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term prognostic utility of computed tomography coronary angiography in older populations

Abstract: Aims The long-term prognostic value of coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA)-identified coronary artery disease (CAD) has not been evaluated in elderly patients (≥70 years). We compared the ability of coronary CCTA to predict 5-year mortality in older vs. younger populations. Methods and results From the prospective CONFIRM (COronary CT Angiography EvaluatioN For Clinical Outcomes: An InteRnational Multicenter) regi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Then, the individual segment scores of all 16 segments were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 48. The prognostic value of these coronary artery plaque scores has been previously demonstrated in patients with suspected stable CAD without current ACS and validated by independent groups . According to the cutoff proposed by Min et al, patients were separated into groups with SIS or SSS of ≤5 vs >5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Then, the individual segment scores of all 16 segments were summed to yield a total score ranging from 0 to 48. The prognostic value of these coronary artery plaque scores has been previously demonstrated in patients with suspected stable CAD without current ACS and validated by independent groups . According to the cutoff proposed by Min et al, patients were separated into groups with SIS or SSS of ≤5 vs >5.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The prognostic value of these coronary artery plaque scores has been previously demonstrated in patients with suspected stable CAD without current ACS 24 and validated by independent groups. [25][26][27] According to the cutoff proposed by Min et al, 24 patients were separated into groups with SIS or SSS of ≤5 vs >5. Finally, a 3-vessel plaque score was calculated as 0 or 1 based on the absence or presence of plaques in the left anterior descending, left circumflex, and right coronary arteries, irrespective of severity.…”
Section: Coronary Computed Tomography Angiographymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Authors analysed CCT results according to age and divided the population into two groups: <70 years (n=7,198) and ≥70 years (n=1,786); they found that the segment involvement score (SIS) was predictive of mortality in both groups. The same study showed that CCT findings predicted long-term MACE in both groups (21).…”
Section: Prognostic Insights Of the Confirm Registrymentioning
confidence: 78%
“…18 Quantifying coronary plaque burden improves risk assessment using both semi-quantitative (SSS, SIS) or quantitative (volumetric) plaque metrics. 19 , 20 Recent studies incorporated the degree of stenosis, plaque morphology, and SSS for the detection of PP. Although quantitative plaque analysis (volumetric change in atheroma burden) is not used routinely in clinical setting, this biomarker has been increasingly utilized for monitoring anti-atherosclerotic drug therapy.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%