2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.joen.2019.11.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Pulpal and Restorative Outcomes of Pulpotomy in Mature Permanent Teeth

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
61
2
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(72 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
7
61
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Longerterm studies of 5-10 years would be helpful to confirm the recommendation of 2 years as sufficient follow-up. Whereas early failures reflect inaccurate assessment of the inflammatory status of the pulp, late failures usually reflect reinfection of the pulp space via a leaky restoration 59 .…”
Section: Length Of Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Longerterm studies of 5-10 years would be helpful to confirm the recommendation of 2 years as sufficient follow-up. Whereas early failures reflect inaccurate assessment of the inflammatory status of the pulp, late failures usually reflect reinfection of the pulp space via a leaky restoration 59 .…”
Section: Length Of Follow-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Management strategies for the treatment of the cariously exposed pulp are also shifting with avoidance of pulpectomy, claiming the superiority of vital pulp treatment (VPT) techniques such as pulp capping, partial and complete pulpotomy [2]. This constant turn toward a conservative and minimally invasive approach is strongly associated with the fact that the emphasis of the profession is also slowly shifting to care for the senior adult segment of the population [3,4]. Under these circumstances, retaining natural teeth is of paramount importance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For many years, the pulpotomy was seen as a provisory treatment which should be substituted by conventional endodontic therapy after the radicular closing and apical foramen formation (Cvek, 1978;Bergenholtz & Spångberg, 2004). However, some researchers have already considered it as definitive treatment when well indicated and carried out, with high rates of success in the long run (Robertson et al, 1996;Rafter, 2005;Forghani et al, 2013;Fuks et al, 1982;Tan et al, 2020). Through periodic clinical-radiographic controls it has become possible to follow-up the biological response to conservative pulp treatment, and also highlight beforehand any possible pathologic alterations (Sonmez & Sonmez., 2007).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%