2016
DOI: 10.1007/s10029-016-1486-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results and complications related to Crurasoft® mesh repair for paraesophageal hiatal hernias

Abstract: In our experience, the recurrence rate in patients with a Crurasoft (Bard) is acceptable. However, the rate of postoperative complications and mortality is excessive. The use of meshes in the hiatus keeps on being controversial due to the severe complications related to them. It would be advisable to compare our results in the non-mesh group in terms of recurrences and complications, to determine if meshes in the hiatus should be given in these patients due to its high rate of complications.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
7
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…HH repair commonly includes the following four steps: hernia sac peeling and resection, mobilization of esophagus, repair of crus diagram, and fundoplication [28,29]. The use of mesh in crural repair has not been widely accepted, but when used, the absorbable mesh is most commonly selected [30][31][32]. Zhang et al [33] confirmed that mesh repair may be associated with fewer short-term recurrences and that biological mesh was associated with improved short-term QOL; however, these advantages were offset by increased instances of dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HH repair commonly includes the following four steps: hernia sac peeling and resection, mobilization of esophagus, repair of crus diagram, and fundoplication [28,29]. The use of mesh in crural repair has not been widely accepted, but when used, the absorbable mesh is most commonly selected [30][31][32]. Zhang et al [33] confirmed that mesh repair may be associated with fewer short-term recurrences and that biological mesh was associated with improved short-term QOL; however, these advantages were offset by increased instances of dysphagia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…При ýтом частота анатомических рецидивов составила 4,0% [14]. Однако в более позднем исследовании ýтих же авторов на 93 пациентах и послеоперационным наблюдением в среднем через 76 мес, частота анатомических рецидивов составила 9,0%, частота реопераций -5,4%, сетка была удалена в трех случаях [15].…”
Section: политетрафторэтиленовые имплантатыunclassified
“… 14 , 15 Also, mesh-related complications have been reported, including intraluminal mesh erosion, dysphagia, esophageal stenosis, stricture formation, mesh migration, and dense fibrosis. 16 18 …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%