2019
DOI: 10.3341/kjo.2018.0028
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Results of Mini Asymmetric Radial Keratotomy and Corneal Cross-linking for the Treatment of Keratoconus

Abstract: Purpose To investigate the long-term results (at least 5 years of follow-up) of the mini asymmetric radial keratotomy (MARK) and corneal cross-linking (CXL) combined intervention, also known as the ‘Rome protocol,’ for patients with progressive stage I and II keratoconus and contact lens intolerance. Methods This was a retrospective observational case series. Fifteen eyes of 12 patients were evaluated, with a mean follow-up of 6.9 years. To assess the efficacy and stabi… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2 In treating progressive keratoconus, corneal CXL has become the gold standard because it strengthens the corneal structure, preventing ectasia. 10 Currently, riboflavin and ultraviolet-A (UVA) are used in conventional CXL. However, the CXL method using riboflavin and UVA is considered to cause discomfort to patients due to the UVA rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 In treating progressive keratoconus, corneal CXL has become the gold standard because it strengthens the corneal structure, preventing ectasia. 10 Currently, riboflavin and ultraviolet-A (UVA) are used in conventional CXL. However, the CXL method using riboflavin and UVA is considered to cause discomfort to patients due to the UVA rays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The former includes penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK), 3 while the latter includes corneal cross-linking (CXL), 4 the gold standard method for Kc treatment, intracorneal ring segments (IcRS), 5 circular keratotomy (CKt), 6 mini asymmetric radial keratotomy (MARK), 7 radial/miniradial keratotomy (RK/Mini-RK), 8,9 and conductive keratoplasty (CKp). 10 Further, there is a more recent trend involving CXL paired with other procedures (CXL Plus), specifically with photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) (Athens Protocol), 11 Laser in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK), 12 ICrS, 13 MARK (Rome Protocol), 14 CKp, 15 and phakic intraocular lenses (PIoL). 16 However, despite its simplicity and effectiveness in halting Kc, CXL does not improve vision, apart from a slight degree of corneal regularisation with epithelium removal, 17 a condition that justifies the rationale behind the other procedures mentioned above.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%