2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2016.10.007
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term results of the Duhamel technique are superior to those of the transanal pullthrough

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
21
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The long-term outcomes of these two techniques vary across published studies, and no consensus has been reached regarding the best technique for HD treatment. 23 To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative outcomes following Duhamel pull-through and TEPT for HD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The long-term outcomes of these two techniques vary across published studies, and no consensus has been reached regarding the best technique for HD treatment. 23 To the best of our knowledge, this study is the first systematic review and meta-analysis comparing postoperative outcomes following Duhamel pull-through and TEPT for HD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In the TEPT procedure, an ileoanal anastomosis is created, aiming to reduce the risk of faecal stasis and development of enterocolitis. There is currently no consensus on which technique may be superior in patients with TCA [6][7][8][9][10]12,19,29,30,34,45]. In this cohort we could not test the difference between the different techniques because of the limited number of patients.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Eighteen (51%) of the 35 questionnaires were returned after a median (range) follow-up period of 11 (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10)(11)(12)(13)(14)(15)(16)(17)(18)(19) years. Of these 18 patients, 10 (56%) were aged 4-11 years, four (22%) were aged 12-17 years and four (22%) were aged 18 years or older.…”
Section: Sample Characteristicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Faecal incontinence in these patients may result from damage to the anal sphincter during reconstructive surgery, depending on the type and quality of the initial surgery. With regard to the type of surgery, there is currently little evidence that substantiates the decision to opt for one technique over another. The authors believe that further analyses, such as anorectal manometry or anal sphincter electromyography, should be performed to assess the differences between the techniques, especially between the transanal endorectal pull‐through and Duhamel operations, which currently are the two most commonly performed procedures.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%