2020
DOI: 10.1111/jfb.14498
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long‐term retention of dummy acoustic transmitters in adult brown trout

Abstract: A group of 36 1+ age class Salmo trutta were surgically implanted with dummy acoustic tags and monitored for 370 days. In total 13 tags were expelled throughout the experiment with an overall tag loss rate of c. 0. 035 tags per day. Fish length was the only explanatory variable which had a significant association with subsequent tag expulsion. The estimated probability of retaining a tag for a year for a fish of length 32 cm was 0.76, 34 cm was 0.60 and 36 cm was 0.38. The long-term tag loss patterns were exam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Tagged fish that were detected actively moving around the lake arrays by the time of tag battery expiry were assumed to be alive. It is possible that some fish may have remained alive but were not actively moving or detected on the lake arrays, and some fish may have expelled their tags (Kennedy et al ., 2020); therefore these data were taken only as a proxy for minimum survival rates in the lake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tagged fish that were detected actively moving around the lake arrays by the time of tag battery expiry were assumed to be alive. It is possible that some fish may have remained alive but were not actively moving or detected on the lake arrays, and some fish may have expelled their tags (Kennedy et al ., 2020); therefore these data were taken only as a proxy for minimum survival rates in the lake.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While differences in life histories, morphology, and behavior may deem some approaches inapplicable to marine turtles, there is much to gain from reviewing studies from fields where acoustic telemetry has been more widely utilized, such as fisheries (see reviews: Heupel and Webber, 2012;Donaldson et al, 2014;Hussey et al, 2015;Matley et al, 2021b). Currently, one of the main limitations to marine turtle acoustic studies is that transmitters are applied externally, which reduces the retention time compared to transmitters surgically implanted in fish and shark species (Smith et al, 2019;Smukall et al, 2019;Kennedy et al, 2020). Although marine turtle transmitter retention varies by species, the longest recorded duration (hawksbill) was just under 4 years (Chevis et al, 2017;Smith et al, 2019).…”
Section: Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The acoustic telemetry work also provides an important enhancement to the overall survival assessments by accounting for potential smolt losses in the lower river below the smolt trap (Flávio et al, 2019) and thus refining the estimates of true marine survival. It should be noted that tag retention is an important consideration for long-term telemetry studies (Kennedy et al, 2020) and previous work on S. salar smolts has indicated c. 20% long-term expulsion rate of similar-sized dummy tags (Brundson et al, 2019). Consequently, the survival estimates generated in the current study should be treated as minimum estimates.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%