2019
DOI: 10.1139/cjfas-2017-0547
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term studies of lobster abundance at a salmon aquaculture site, eastern Canada

Abstract: Wild lobster (Homarus americanus) abundance was monitored before, during, and after salmon (Salmo salar) aquaculture production in a bay on Grand Manan Island, New Brunswick, Canada, in an 8-year survey, 2008 to 2015. Diver transects and free-area spot-dives were used to measure the carapace length and determine sex (including berried state) of each lobster encountered both inside (farm) and outside (reference) the lease boundaries. In pairwise comparisons of each sampling date, there was no significant differ… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The interaction between salmon cages and wild lobsters is an important area of research, especially in Canada where studies have explored the conflict over use of space between salmon farms and lobster fisheries (Walters 2007, Grant et al 2019. In Canada and Norway, research has also focussed on the potential impact of medicinal treatments used for salmon aquaculture on lobsters (Burridge et al 2014, Cresci et al 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interaction between salmon cages and wild lobsters is an important area of research, especially in Canada where studies have explored the conflict over use of space between salmon farms and lobster fisheries (Walters 2007, Grant et al 2019. In Canada and Norway, research has also focussed on the potential impact of medicinal treatments used for salmon aquaculture on lobsters (Burridge et al 2014, Cresci et al 2018.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sediment production was different among treatments with the highest value in APH treatment and the lowest value in HP. This was expected, as sediments derive from deposition of fish feed and feces (Grant et al, 2019) which of course increased with increasing stoking density. No statistical differences among treatments were obtained considering sediment N concentration and content (Table 4).…”
Section: Sedimentmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…Following the earlier work of Lawton et al (2001) that used diver surveys to assess lobster populations in LFAs 36 and 38 in New Brunswick, the provincial government requested monitoring at a new salmon farm to ensure that the farm had no deleterious effects on lobster, and the direct observation approach was revisited. To circumvent some of the potential limitations associated with other methods, Grant et al (2019) conducted diver transect surveys of American lobster abundance at aquaculture and reference sites, over 8 years and multiple salmon production cycles. There was no significant impact of the Atlantic salmon aquaculture operation on lobster proximate abundance relative to reference and farm locations at a New Brunswick salmon farm over the study period (Grant et al 2019).…”
Section: Direct Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To circumvent some of the potential limitations associated with other methods, Grant et al (2019) conducted diver transect surveys of American lobster abundance at aquaculture and reference sites, over 8 years and multiple salmon production cycles. There was no significant impact of the Atlantic salmon aquaculture operation on lobster proximate abundance relative to reference and farm locations at a New Brunswick salmon farm over the study period (Grant et al 2019). Grant et al (2019) reported independent trends in lobster abundance and farm operational status (i.e., feed and fallow periods) and found that the lowest abundance of lobster was recorded at both the farm and reference sites before the farm became operational.…”
Section: Direct Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation