2009
DOI: 10.13182/fst09-32
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-Term Survival of Grazing-Incidence Metal Mirrors for Laser Fusion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Research has shown that a reflector made of a solid solution alloy of aluminum with 5% copper can withstand well above 3.5 J/cm 2 for over 10 7 pulses with no damage. 886 Neutrons scattering off the GIMM will be incident on the upstream optics. GIMMs are large (typically 3.44 m  4.05 m, at a distance of 24 m from the target 884 ), so it is desirable to make these upstream optics using something other than a GIMM.…”
Section: Final Optics and Illumination Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Research has shown that a reflector made of a solid solution alloy of aluminum with 5% copper can withstand well above 3.5 J/cm 2 for over 10 7 pulses with no damage. 886 Neutrons scattering off the GIMM will be incident on the upstream optics. GIMMs are large (typically 3.44 m  4.05 m, at a distance of 24 m from the target 884 ), so it is desirable to make these upstream optics using something other than a GIMM.…”
Section: Final Optics and Illumination Geometrymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the case of silica ∂n/∂T n−1 ∼ 3×10 −5 K −1 [24], and α ∼ 5×10 −7 K −1 [13], i.e. two orders of magnitude lower 4 .…”
Section: Temperature Variationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An alternative to the cassette of lenses is the use of grazing incidence metallic mirrors (GIMM). GIMM have been designed and tested during the high average power laser program [4]. The real drawback of the metallic mirrors (apart of radiation-resistance considerations) is the distance from the target: 24 m to the focal point, which is three times longer than the NIF/LMJ focal length (8 m); so far it is almost impossible to reach the same beam pointing accuracy on the target [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Other designs, for example HAPL 17 , propose the use of mirrors far away from the target. Such a scheme assures a minimum radiation load onto the mirrors at the expense of using long focal lengths.…”
Section: Hiper Final Optics Assembly (Foa)mentioning
confidence: 99%