2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.gecco.2014.08.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term trends in the use of a protected area by small cetaceans in relation to changes in population status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
63
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 41 publications
(67 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
4
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Even with our most precise abundance estimates, it would take a minimum of seven years to detect modest rates of change with high statistical power, by which time populations could be depleted to very low levels (Table 5). Furthermore, trends in the abundance of cetaceans can be complicated by natural variability, such as movements in or out of a study site (Forney, 2000;Parra et al, 2006a;Cheney et al, 2014). This reinforces the recommendation that implementing conservation measures should not be contingent upon statistically robust proof of a decline for small populations of cetaceans (Taylor and Gerrodette, 1993;Thompson et al, 2000;Taylor et al, 2007).…”
Section: Implications For Conservation and Managementsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Even with our most precise abundance estimates, it would take a minimum of seven years to detect modest rates of change with high statistical power, by which time populations could be depleted to very low levels (Table 5). Furthermore, trends in the abundance of cetaceans can be complicated by natural variability, such as movements in or out of a study site (Forney, 2000;Parra et al, 2006a;Cheney et al, 2014). This reinforces the recommendation that implementing conservation measures should not be contingent upon statistically robust proof of a decline for small populations of cetaceans (Taylor and Gerrodette, 1993;Thompson et al, 2000;Taylor et al, 2007).…”
Section: Implications For Conservation and Managementsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…The value of long-term data to support conservation and adaptive management of wildlife populations is well-recognized (e.g., Clutton-Brock and Sheldon, 2010;Cheney et al, 2014), and recent expert-led prioritization exercises have emphasized the need for long-term studies of population dynamics of inshore dolphins in northern Australia (Department of the Environment, 2013aEnvironment, , 2015. They encourage multi-year, multidisciplinary studies at appropriate reference sites (representing a range of levels of human impact), including data on abundance and habitat use, to facilitate: detecting trends in the abundance of local populations; the investigation of natural variability in characteristics of populations (e.g., abundance and habitat use) and their relationship to environmental stochastic events (e.g., cyclones); collecting life history data to inform assessments of population viability; and, developing a greater understanding of threatening processes and mitigation options (Department of the Environment, 2015).…”
Section: Implications For Conservation and Managementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The trajectory of this bottlenose dolphin population is currently stable [26,27] and, despite the biases deriving from the small sample size, the simulation study suggested that the proposed developments are unlikely to cause a substantial disruption of calf survival (or, at least, the effect cannot be distinguished from natural individual heterogeneity). In the light of these results, the condition of individuals should now be monitored, so that any deterioration following increased exposure to disturbance can be rapidly detected, before it translates into longer-term changes in the population's trend.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…We focused on the sighting history of calves that were consistently associated with the same female [39], because we anticipated that disturbance was more likely to affect calf survival rather than female pregnancy rate [40,41]. Details of the photo-identification data collection are provided in [26,27,37]. We developed a multi-stage model of calf history, where each calf could transition between four different stages: -stage 1: newborn (age 0, born in that same year); -stage 2: age 1 or 2 years; -stage 3: age 3 or more; or -stage 4: dead.…”
Section: (B) a Multi-stage Model For Calf Survivalmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Known-age cetacean and sirenian studies require other methods; photoidentification is now a commonly used method to identify and follow several species (e.g., bottlenose dolphins (e.g., Cheney et al 2014), manatees (e.g., Langtimm et al 2004), killer whales (e.g., Young et al 2011) and humpback whales (e.g., Mizroch et al 2004)), so the number of known-aged animals for a wider variety of species, should become increasingly available. Photo-id is being conducted using nicks and notches on the dorsal ridge of narwhals (Auger-Méthé et al 2010) so in the future, known-age animals should be available.…”
Section: Known Age or Known Historymentioning
confidence: 99%