2020
DOI: 10.2112/si95-095.1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Long-term Variability in Inorganic Sediment Contributions to the Great Marsh, Massachusetts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We could not deploy traps or instruments in the winter due to water freezing in sediment traps and around sensors. Thus, winter sedimentation was not assessed, and our study excludes sediment delivered to the marsh via ice rafting (Argow et al., 2011; Fitzgerald et al., 2020b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…We could not deploy traps or instruments in the winter due to water freezing in sediment traps and around sensors. Thus, winter sedimentation was not assessed, and our study excludes sediment delivered to the marsh via ice rafting (Argow et al., 2011; Fitzgerald et al., 2020b).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most recently, Fitzgerald et al. (2020a, 2020b) found that sediment‐laden ice rafted onto the marsh surface during the winter storm season was a significant source to Great Marsh in Barnstable, MA (for example, a January 2018 Nor'easter delivered the equivalent of 15 years of clastic sediment).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further research is needed to evaluate the eventual disposition of the coarse sediment fraction entering through the inlet. For example, an observation that peat in Plum Island Sound marsh is composed chiefly of silt and fine sand 74 suggests that imported coarse sediment could contribute to marsh mineral accretion. Likewise, incorporating the effects of vegetation, and waves and major storms would aid in making the modeling predictions more robust.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This back-barrier marsh has a tidal range of 2.6 to 2.8 m and consists of marsh and large open water areas with sandy shoals. The estuaries in the system provide low suspended sediment input 35 , and the mean grain size across the marsh is approximately 24% sand, 58% silt, and 17% clay 36 .
Figure 5 Map of Great Marsh study site.
…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%