2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.12.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Longitudinal administrative data can be used to examine multimorbidity, provided false discoveries are controlled for

Abstract: Using observed/expected ratios calculated from the administrative data set, we were able to (1) better quantify known morbidity pairings while also revealing hitherto unnoticed associations, (2) find out which pairings cluster most strongly, and (3) gain insight into which diseases cluster frequently with other diseases. Caveats with this method are finding spurious associations on the basis of too few observed cases and the dependency of the ratio magnitude on the length of the time frame observed.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
29
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
3
29
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results show increases between 25.2% and 78.7% in an 11-year period for all provinces and territories studied with the exception of Nunavut; further investigation is needed to determine why these increases have occurred. Wong et al 33 cautioned that there is the opportunity for an increased number of false positive cases to accrue over time, which may contribute to inflated rates of increasing prevalence across study years. For Nunavut, the large increases in prevalence may reflect the fact that Nunavut officially became a territory in 1999 and therefore its administrative databases may not have had time to sufficiently capture prevalent cases by 2001/02.…”
Section: Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our results show increases between 25.2% and 78.7% in an 11-year period for all provinces and territories studied with the exception of Nunavut; further investigation is needed to determine why these increases have occurred. Wong et al 33 cautioned that there is the opportunity for an increased number of false positive cases to accrue over time, which may contribute to inflated rates of increasing prevalence across study years. For Nunavut, the large increases in prevalence may reflect the fact that Nunavut officially became a territory in 1999 and therefore its administrative databases may not have had time to sufficiently capture prevalent cases by 2001/02.…”
Section: Health Promotion and Chronic Disease Prevention In Canadamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The first category comprises studies that differentiate the effect of mortality by underlying cause-of-death. For example, decedents from cancer and respiratory diseases have significantly higher end-oflife spending than decedents from heart disease, indicating that the precise effect of mortality depends on the specific health problem (Bird et al 2002;Seshamani and Gray 2004;Wong et al 2011a), and also on the coexistence of other health problems (e.g., Wong et al 2011b;Häkkinen et al 2008). Second, there are studies that use both mortality and general health indicators to explain health expenditures.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The knowledge retrieved from a study of evolution of multimorbidity has the potential to identify populations at high risk of developing multimorbidity as well as repartitioning CDs across this continuum. Few studies [13], [14], [15], [16] have examined multimorbidity from a longitudinal perspective. Those studies focused mostly on the impact of CDs on disability, functional decline and mortality [14] or its relationship with nutrition [16].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the strength of association between CDs at a specific time point (e.g. observed over expected ratio) [17], a longitudinal follow-up design is rarely used in the context of multimorbidity and could help understand causality [15]. To the best of our knowledge, no study has used a longitudinal study design to investigate the evolution of multimorbidity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%