Longitudinal assessment of the common sense model before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large coeliac disease cohort study

Möller, Stéphan; Apputhurai, Pragalathan; Tye–Din, Jason A.; Knowles, Simon R.

doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2021.110711

Cited by 3 publications

(27 citation statements)

References 70 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…To explore the dynamic processes of the CSM, several researchers have called for the evaluation of the CSM using crosslagged panel model approaches using longitudinal-based studies (Hagger & Orbell, 2021;Hagger et al, 2017). To the authors knowledge only one study (Möller et al, 2021a) has applied a cross-lagged panel design to evaluate the CSM. Guided by the findings of Möller et al (Möller et al, 2021a), using a cross-lagged panel design, we aimed to examine the interrelationships of COVID-19 perceptions, GI symptoms, GI-illness perceptions, coping, catastrophising, psychological distress, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…To the authors knowledge only one study (Möller et al, 2021a) has applied a cross-lagged panel design to evaluate the CSM. Guided by the findings of Möller et al (Möller et al, 2021a), using a cross-lagged panel design, we aimed to examine the interrelationships of COVID-19 perceptions, GI symptoms, GI-illness perceptions, coping, catastrophising, psychological distress, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Similarly, GI symptoms moderated the association between social isolation and psychological distress at the time of the COVID-19 pandemic (Mikocka-Walus, Skvarc, de Acosta, et al, 2021 ). At the same time, the relationship between product shortages and psychological distress was moderated by COVID-19 fear (Mikocka-Walus, Skvarc, van Tilburg, et al, 2021 ).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In such a design, the CSM constructs are measured on two or more times with cross-lagged (i.e., reciprocal) and time-lagged effects being simultaneously evaluated. Heeding this call, in a recent study, Möller and colleagues (Möller et al, 2021a ) conducted the first cross-lagged analysis of the CSM pre and during the COVID-19 pandemic recruiting 674 individuals living with coeliac disease. In brief, the study provided evidence for the dynamic nature of the CSM.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…Guided by the CSM and the findings of our recent study (Möller et al, 2021a ), we aimed to examine the interrelationships of COVID-19 perceptions, GI symptoms, GI-illness perceptions, coping, catastrophising, psychological distress, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic. Utilising a cross-lagged panel model (see Fig.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Impact of Covid-19-Related Perceptions on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in an International Gastrointestinal Cohort Over Time Guided by the Common Sense Model

Knowles

Möller

Stengel

et al. 2023

J Clin Psychol Med Settings

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this longitudinal study was to examine changes in COVID-19 and illness-related perceptions, gastrointestinal symptoms, coping, catastrophising, psychological distress, and QoL during the COVID-19 pandemic. A total of 831 adults with a gastrointestinal condition completed an online questionnaire at baseline (May—October 2020). Of those, 270 (32.5%) participants (85.2% female, mean age = 47.3 years) provided follow-up data (March—May 2021). Repeated-measures multiple analysis of variance and a cross-lagged panel model were used to test the study hypotheses. Gastrointestinal symptoms and COVID-19 perceptions at follow-up were strongly predicted by their baseline values, while illness perceptions were predicted by baseline gastrointestinal symptoms. Cross-lagged relationships indicated a reciprocal relationship between gastrointestinal symptoms and psychological distress. Moreover, gastrointestinal symptoms had substantial predictive utility, strongly predicting future gastrointestinal symptoms, and to a lesser extent, more negative illness perceptions, greater psychological distress, and greater use of adaptive coping strategies across time.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Exploring the Impact of Covid-19-Related Perceptions on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in an International Gastrointestinal Cohort Over Time Guided by the Common Sense Model

Knowles

Möller

Stengel

et al. 2023

J Clin Psychol Med Settings

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

COVID-19 and celiac disease: a review

Cohen

Lebwohl

2023

Therap Adv Gastroenterol

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The aim of this review is to broadly cover how the COVID-19 pandemic has affected individuals with celiac disease, including perceived risk, risk of contraction or severe infection, considerations regarding vaccination, access to gluten-free food during the pandemic, and possible long-term changes to the practice of celiac disease management spurred by the pandemic. While initially there was increased perceived risk about COVID-19 in the celiac disease population, studies have found that individuals with celiac disease are not at an increased risk of contracting or having a severe course compared to the general population. There is not yet evidence that COVID-19 infection will lead to an increase in celiac disease incidence, though more research on this topic with longer-term follow-up is necessary to make this determination. Limited access to in-person visits led to an increase in telemedicine, which was adopted swiftly by this patient population and may offer improved access in the long term. In summary, individuals with celiac disease do not appear to be at an increased risk of contracting COVID-19 or having a more severe disease course.

show abstract

Celiac disease and COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review

et al. 2023

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background Celiac disease (CD) is an autoimmune disease affecting around 1.4% of the total human population. Local and systemic manifestations are described in CD. Viral infections seem to trigger CD or even have a worse outcome in CD patients. The evidence on the relationship between CD and coronavirus disease (COVID-19) is limited. To evaluate existing evidence on the association between CD and COVID-19, we conducted the current systematic review. Methods We systematically searched Pubmed, Scopus, and Embase databases to find articles that reported risks or outcomes of COVID-19 in CD patients. Papers in any language published up to November 17, 2022, were evaluated for possible inclusion. The results were analyzed qualitatively. This study is registered with PROSPERO(CRD42022327380). Results We identified 509 studies by searching databases; 14 reported data on the risk or outcome of COVID-19 in CD patients and were eligible for qualitative synthesis. We found that the relative risk of acquiring COVID-19 in CD patients may be lower than in the general population. Approximately 90% of infected patients were treated as an outpatient, and 10% were hospitalized. GFD adherence and Health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) were more or less the same before and during the pandemic. The gluten-free products (GFP) supply seems to be plunged during the pandemic. The data on the psychological effects of the pandemic were conflicting. Conclusion The risk of acquiring COVID-19 in CD patients is lower than in the general population. Females were more likely to be infected by COVID-19, and the most common comorbidity in infected patients was a chronic lower respiratory disease; around 10% of infected patients needed hospitalization, GFD adherence, and HR-QOL was more or less the same before and during the pandemic, depression, anxiety, and stress levels of patients varied among studies. Patients had more difficulties accessing GFPs based on limited data.

show abstract

Longitudinal assessment of the common sense model before and during the COVID-19 pandemic: A large coeliac disease cohort study

Cited by 3 publications

References 70 publications

Exploring the Impact of Covid-19-Related Perceptions on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in an International Gastrointestinal Cohort Over Time Guided by the Common Sense Model

Exploring the Impact of Covid-19-Related Perceptions on Psychological Distress and Quality of Life in an International Gastrointestinal Cohort Over Time Guided by the Common Sense Model

COVID-19 and celiac disease: a review

Celiac disease and COVID-19 in adults: A systematic review

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About